2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2022.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of artificial intelligence in emergency radiology: An overview of current applications, challenges, and opportunities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various software based artificial intelligence has been developed and will be the future. 12 One of the most significant advancements is the widespread adoption of computed tomography (CT) scans, which provide detailed images of the body and enable rapid diagnoses of a wide range of medical conditions. Another important development is the use of portable ultrasound machines, which allow radiologists to perform real-time imaging and diagnosis at the bedside in the emergency department.…”
Section: Recent Advancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various software based artificial intelligence has been developed and will be the future. 12 One of the most significant advancements is the widespread adoption of computed tomography (CT) scans, which provide detailed images of the body and enable rapid diagnoses of a wide range of medical conditions. Another important development is the use of portable ultrasound machines, which allow radiologists to perform real-time imaging and diagnosis at the bedside in the emergency department.…”
Section: Recent Advancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, CAST is being studied to alleviate congestion and perform rapid diagnoses. A previous study on the implementation of AI/ML-based CAD approved by the FDA in the ER indicated that numerous products are available for immediate use in emergency medicine [60]. The main targets of AI/ML-based CAD in ERs are stroke, followed by intracranial haemorrhage, spine injury, and other circumstances in which a delay of a few minutes could worsen the prognosis.…”
Section: Applicability Of Computer-aided Simple Triagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…QA1 QA2 QA3 QA4 Total P1 Abdellatif et al [16] 1 0 0 1 2 P2 Khan et al [17] 1 1 1 0.5 3.5 P3 Shaikh et al [18] 0 1.5 1 0 2.5 P4 Zarembo et al [19] 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 2 P5 Cao et al [20] 1 0.5 0 0 1.5 P6 Yang et al [21] 1 0.5 1 0.5 3 P7 Cote et al [22] 1 1 1 1 4 P8 Xu et al [23] 0.5 1 1 0.5 3 P9 Dey et al [24] 1 1 0.5 0 2.5 P10 Zanca et al [25] 1 0 1 1 3 P11 Al-Dasuqi et al [26] 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 2.5 P12 O'Hare et al [27] 1 1 1 0.5 3.5 P13 Druffel et al [28] 0 0 1 1 2 P14 Perkusich et al [29] 0.5 1 1 1 3.5 P15 Vinsard et al [30] 0.5 0 0.5 1 2 P16 Beegle et al [31] 1 0 1 0.5 2.5 P17 Salahirad et al [32] 1 1 0.5 0.5 3 P18 Dlamini et al [33] 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 2 P19 Cross et al [34] 0.5 1 1 1 3.5 P20 Malamateniou et al [35] 0 0 1 1 2 P21 Lenarduzzi et al [7] 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 2.5 P22 Sikorska et al [36] 0 1 0 1 2 P23 Field et al [37] 1 1 0 1 3 P24 Gao et al [38] 0.5 0 0 0 0.5 P25 Khanagar et al [39] 1 0 0 1 2 P26 Shafiq et al [40] 1 0.5 1 1 3.5 P27 Waade et al [41] 1 1 1 0.5 3.5 P28 Felderer et al [42] 1 0 0 0 1 P29 Ji et al [43] 0 0 1 1 2 P30 Harman et al [44] 1 0.5 1 1 3.5 P31 Shehab et al [45] 0 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5 P32 Rana et al [46] 1 1 1 0 3 P33 Huang et al [47] 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 2.5 P34 Shakeel et al [48] 1 0.5 1 1 3.5 P35 Zhou et al [49] 0.5 0.5 0 0 1 P36 Sayago-Heredia et al…”
Section: Appendix Scores -Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%