2013
DOI: 10.1111/pbr.12036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of asynchrony in flowering for easy and economical polyhaploid induction in wheat following Imperata cylindrica‐mediated chromosome elimination approach

Abstract: Wheat × Imperata cylindrica‐mediated approach of doubled haploidy breeding requires hand emasculation followed by pollination with I. cylindrica pollen. The pace of this endeavour can be enhanced by utilizing asynchronous flowering of wheat spikes by direct pollination without emasculation followed by morphological marker–assisted screening of selfed and crossed seeds. The emasculated and un‐emasculated spikes of 13 spring and six winter wheat genotypes and two triticale × wheat derivatives were pollinated wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, unlikely hybrids with genomes from both the parental species are not always obtained. Uniparental chromosome elimination, the removal of the one parent chromosomes from the wide hybrids, might be a benefit to the breeders for fast genetic improvement of the crop cultivars ( Chaudhary et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, unlikely hybrids with genomes from both the parental species are not always obtained. Uniparental chromosome elimination, the removal of the one parent chromosomes from the wide hybrids, might be a benefit to the breeders for fast genetic improvement of the crop cultivars ( Chaudhary et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an early stage of development of a hybrid embryo, chromosomes of the female are eliminated and developed haploid embryos contain only chromosomes of cultivated barley ( Liu et al, 2014 ). Chromosome elimination has been described in crosses of Triticum aestivum and Triticeae species ( H. vulgare and H. bulbosum ) as well as more distantly related species ( Zea mays , Pennisetum glaucum , Sorghum bicolor , Coix lacryma-jobi , Imperata cylindrica ) ( Barclay, 1975 ; Laurie & Bennett, 1986 ; Laurie & Bennett, 1988 ; Laurie, 1989 ; Inagaki & Mujeeb-Kazi, 1995 ; Mochida & Tsujimoto, 2001 ; Gernand et al, 2005 ; Komeda et al, 2007 ; Chaudhary et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last few years, chromosome elimination approach has proved to be the efficient system of doubled haploidy breeding as compared to other biotechnological tools like androgenesis mediated approach (Chu et al 1973;Ouyang et al 1973;Wang et al 1973). Chromosome elimination-mediated doubled haploidy breeding includes the various approaches viz., bulbosum technique (Barclay 1975), wheat × maize system Bennett 1987, 1988) and the recently discovered wheat × Imperata cylindrica system which has emerged as the best choice for haploid induction in wheat (Chaudhary et al 2005(Chaudhary et al , 2013a(Chaudhary et al , 2013bChaudhary 2008Chaudhary , 2009Chaudhary , 2010aChaudhary , 2010bKaila et al 2012) as well as in durum wheat (Mahato and Chaudhary 2015). Despite immense importance and advantages of doubled haploidy (DH) breeding, its extensive adoption in crop improvement programmes is lacking because of low frequency of production of doubled haploids due to high mortality rate of regenerated haploid plants after colchicine treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manuscript to be reviewed haploid embryos contain only chromosomes of cultivated barley (Liu et al 2014). Chromosome elimination has been described in crosses of Triticum aestivum and Triticeae species (H. vulgare and H. bulbosum) as well as more distantly related species (Zea mays, Pennisetum glaucum, Sorghum bicolor, Coix lacryma-jobi, Imperata cylindrica) (Barclay 1975;Laurie andBennett 1986, 1988;Laurie 1989;Inagaki and Mujeeb-Kazi 1995;Mochida and Tsujimoto 2001;Gernand et al 2005;Komeda et al 2007;Chaudhary et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%