2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.10.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of autologous fat grafting for breast reconstruction: A systematic review with meta-analysis of oncological outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
76
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
76
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…4,7,12 The main outcomes of interest were safety, effectiveness, and efficiency of AFG, and studies that reported data on these outcomes were included. Table 1 describes the components of each of the outcomes of interest.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4,7,12 The main outcomes of interest were safety, effectiveness, and efficiency of AFG, and studies that reported data on these outcomes were included. Table 1 describes the components of each of the outcomes of interest.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the dramatic increase in publications in the previous 5 years, the search focused on studies published during this time period (April 1, 2010–April 30, 2015). 4 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of fat resorption remained stable after the ninth month, and even seemed to be lower (44.02%) after 3 years. In a review of 24 studies, Agha et al (43) reported 207 complications, occurring in 7.3% of 2832 treated breasts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these concerns, in 2012, the ASPS Fat Graft Task Force did not find ''any reports suggesting an increased risk of malignancy associated with fat grafting'' and so far, clinical reviews have not revealed any increased cancerous relapse when using AFG to the breast [18,22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%