2021 IEEE 93rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2021-Spring) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/vtc2021-spring51267.2021.9448935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Bayesian Changepoint Detection for Spectrum Sensing in Mobile Cognitive Radio

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One potential disadvantage of the approach presented in [21] is that the integration of CSS and the removal of the cyclic prefix (CP) may introduce additional complexity and computational overhead to the system. The authors of [22] explored the use of Bayesian changepoint detection method and incorporates knowledge about the environment and user mobility parameters to improve spectrum occupancy detection in a mobile cognitive radio scenario. The drawback of this method is that it exhibits reduced performance at higher SNR, indicating a potential limitation in scenarios with stronger signals or lower noise levels.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One potential disadvantage of the approach presented in [21] is that the integration of CSS and the removal of the cyclic prefix (CP) may introduce additional complexity and computational overhead to the system. The authors of [22] explored the use of Bayesian changepoint detection method and incorporates knowledge about the environment and user mobility parameters to improve spectrum occupancy detection in a mobile cognitive radio scenario. The drawback of this method is that it exhibits reduced performance at higher SNR, indicating a potential limitation in scenarios with stronger signals or lower noise levels.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of advantages of the quick detection theory, the CSS problem related to hypothesis test (ie, changepoint detection, sequential test, and Bayesian detection) is gained more in‐depth insight on the performance or efficiency in cognitive UAV or radio networks, that is, .References 4‐20. These related works have varying degrees of advantages or disadvantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morere et al formulated a Bayesian optimisation for continuous UAV trajectories within a partially observable Markov decision process framework in Reference 6 which is solved by Monte‐Carlo tree search and a reward function balancing exploration and exploitation. In Reference 7, a low‐complexity likelihood ratio test based on Shiryaev algorithm for spectrum sensing was introduced at low SNR by Chede et al Apparently, References 4‐7 took quickest detection for spectrum sensing into consideration for cognitive UAV or radio networks, they usually focused on the spectrum sensing performance improvement while ignore sensing efficiency (it is very important to consider spectrum sensing efficiency for battery limited UAV networks), especially the tradeoff problem between the spectrum sensing performance and efficiency or the optimal sensing strategy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…X. Ma et al formulated the Bayesian two‐stage sequential change diagnosis problem in Reference 19 to obtain the optimal rule. A. S. V. Chede proposed a low‐complexity Shiryaev algorithm for mobile CR to implement Bayesian changepoint detection in Reference 20. The aforementioned works, basically used a series of CUSUM algorithms and quickest detection theory to address CSS problem, however, such algorithms pay less attention to the impact of specific sensing parameters or environment on CSS, especially when the UAVs may follow various flight trajectories in a mobile or multi‐channel scenario, which is often the case in CUAVNs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%