The results of viscosity measurements at moderate densities on the two gaseous mixtures carbon dioxide–nitrogen and ethane–methane including the pure gases between 253.15 K and 473.15 K, originally performed by Humberg et al. at Ruhr University Bochum, Germany, using a rotating-cylinder viscometer between 0.1 MPa and 2.0 MPa, were employed to determine the interaction viscosity, $$\eta _{12}^{(0)}$$
η
12
(
0
)
, and the product of molar density and diffusion coefficient, $$(\rho D_{12})^{(0)}$$
(
ρ
D
12
)
(
0
)
, each in the limit of zero density. The isothermal viscosity data were evaluated by those authors with density series restricted to the second order at most to derive the zero-density viscosities and initial density viscosity coefficients, $$\eta _\textrm{mix}^{(0)}$$
η
mix
(
0
)
and $$\eta _\textrm{mix}^{(1)}$$
η
mix
(
1
)
, for the mixtures, as well as, $$\eta _i^{(0)}$$
η
i
(
0
)
and $$\eta _i^{(1)}$$
η
i
(
1
)
($$i=1,2$$
i
=
1
,
2
), respectively, for the pure gases. Humberg et al. have already compared their $$\eta _\textrm{mix}^{(0)}$$
η
mix
(
0
)
and $$\eta _i^{(0)}$$
η
i
(
0
)
data for carbon dioxide–nitrogen and ethane–methane with corresponding viscosity values theoretically computed for the nonspherical potentials of the intermolecular interaction. Now we employed $$\eta _\textrm{mix}^{(0)}$$
η
mix
(
0
)
and $$\eta _\textrm{mix}^{(1)}$$
η
mix
(
1
)
as well as $$\eta _i^{(0)}$$
η
i
(
0
)
and $$\eta _i^{(1)}$$
η
i
(
1
)
in two procedures to derive $$\eta _{12}^{(0)}$$
η
12
(
0
)
values. For this, we needed $$A_{12}^*$$
A
12
∗
values (ratio between effective cross-sections of viscosity and diffusion). But the second procedure applying the initial density viscosity coefficients $$\eta _\textrm{mix}^{(1)}$$
η
mix
(
1
)
and $$\eta _i^{(1)}$$
η
i
(
1
)
failed to yield reasonable $$\eta _{12}^{(0)}$$
η
12
(
0
)
values. The first procedure should provide the best results when it is possible to use $$A_{12}^*$$
A
12
∗
values computed for the nonspherical potential. The effect is comparatively small if $$\eta _{12}^{(0)}$$
η
12
(
0
)
is determined. But if $$(\rho D_{12})^{(0)}$$
(
ρ
D
12
)
(
0
)
is calculated from $$\eta _{12}^{(0)}$$
η
12
(
0
)
using $$A_{12}^*$$
A
12
∗
values for the nonspherical potential, the impact is several percent. Moreover, the experimentally based $$\eta _{12}^{(0)}$$
η
12
(
0
)
and $$(\rho D_{12})^{(0)}$$
(
ρ
D
12
)
(
0
)
data agree with theoretically calculated values for the nonspherical potentials.