2000
DOI: 10.3354/meps193201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of blubber fatty acid profiles to distinguish dietary differences between grey seals Halichoerus grypus from two UK breeding colonies

Abstract: The population structure of grey seals Halichoerus grypus has previously been studied using molecular biological techniques. These works may be complemented by studies of certain ecological factors which play an important role in providing information on habitat usage, dietary behaviour, local migrations, distribution and social structure. One such factor is the fatty acid composition of depot fats, which is strongly influenced by the fatty acid composition found in the prey. To examine the extent to which the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…top predators from different regions may have different FA signatures and still have similar diets if the prey themselves have different diets). Despite these restrictive prerequisites, our study and others have detected interpopulation and seasonal variation in FA profiles of marine predators such as seals (Iverson et al 1997b;Walton et al 2000;Walton & Pomeroy 2003). However, when a predator is known to eat a wide range of prey species within a comparatively limited foraging range, the ability to use FA signatures to detect such variation is limited (Dahl et al 2000;Hooker et al 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…top predators from different regions may have different FA signatures and still have similar diets if the prey themselves have different diets). Despite these restrictive prerequisites, our study and others have detected interpopulation and seasonal variation in FA profiles of marine predators such as seals (Iverson et al 1997b;Walton et al 2000;Walton & Pomeroy 2003). However, when a predator is known to eat a wide range of prey species within a comparatively limited foraging range, the ability to use FA signatures to detect such variation is limited (Dahl et al 2000;Hooker et al 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Several indirect methods are now being used to provide dietary information in addition to the conventional fecal analyses. Lipids, particularly fatty acids (FAs), may function as dietary indicators by comparing FA signatures of prey items and consequent comparison with predator tissues that are high in lipid, such as milk (Iverson 1993, Brown et al 1999 and adipose tissue (Raclot et al 1998, Kirsch et al 2000, Walton et al 2000. This technique is based on the principle that unique arrays of FAs can be transferred largely unaltered up the food chain from prey to predator , Raclot et al 1998.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite some debate in recent years over the use of this method of dietary investigation in apex predators , Thiemann et al 2004, the qualitative use of FA has proven to be useful in elucidating geographical (e.g. Walton et al 2000), ecotype (e.g. Herman et al 2005) and sex (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of prey FA and calibration data, FA profiles of predators are useful to detect qualitative dietary changes and differences among demographic groups (e.g. Walton et al 2000, Beck et al 2005, Herman et al 2005, based on the established understanding that FA structures are transferred across trophic levels largely unchanged (e.g. Ackman & Eaton 1966, Cook 1991.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%