Biocomputing '99 1998
DOI: 10.1142/9789814447300_0018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of BONSAI decision trees for the identification of potential MHC Class I peptide epitope motifs

Abstract: Recognition of short peptides of 8 to 10 mer bound to MHC class I molecules by cytotoxic T lymphocytes forms the basis of cellular immunity. While the sequence motifs necessary for binding of intracellular peptides to MHC have been well studied, little is known about sequence motifs that may cause preferential affinity to the T cell receptor and/or preferential recognition and response by T cells. Here we demonstrate that computational learning systems can be useful to elucidate sequence motifs that affect T c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this approach, the DT is used to construct a graph model of the MHC-peptide binding motif, which subsequently can be used to decide whether a test peptide fits into that motif. Savoie et al [56] were the first to report the use of BONSAI DTs to predict peptide binding for HLA-A*0201. A similar tree-structured technique was later reported by Segal et al [57] to predict peptide binding to K b (a mouse MHCI molecule).…”
Section: Machine Learning-based Motifsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this approach, the DT is used to construct a graph model of the MHC-peptide binding motif, which subsequently can be used to decide whether a test peptide fits into that motif. Savoie et al [56] were the first to report the use of BONSAI DTs to predict peptide binding for HLA-A*0201. A similar tree-structured technique was later reported by Segal et al [57] to predict peptide binding to K b (a mouse MHCI molecule).…”
Section: Machine Learning-based Motifsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general methods, such as classification and regression trees, Neural Networks (NN), Hidden Markov Models (HMM), or Support Vector Machines (SVM), multivariate statistical approaches and decision trees, take into account possible combined influences of multiple residues in different positions in a peptide. Decision trees [11] were used to predict MHC-peptide binding. Decision trees use a natural and intuitive way to classify a pattern through a sequence of questions in which the next question asked depends on the answer to the current question [12].…”
Section: Review Of Current Machine Learning Methods In Predicting Hla-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data-driven approaches include statistical methods based on experimental peptide binding measurements. These methods include binding motifs (Rammensee et al, 1993), quantitative matrices (Parker et al, 1994;Singh and Raghava, 2003;Reche and Reinherz, 2005;Peters and Sette, 2005), artificial neural networks (ANN) (Honeyman et al, 1998;Christensen et al, 2003), hidden Markov models (HMM) (Mamitsuka, 1998;Brusic et al, 2002), decision trees (Savoie et al, 1999;Segal et al, 2001), discriminant analysis (Mallios, 2001), multivariate regression (Lin et al, 2004), ensemble classifier (Xiao and Segal, 2005), support vector machines (SVM) (Donnes and Elofsson, 2002;Zhao et al, 2003;Bhasin and Raghava, 2004;Riedesel et al, 2004;Bozic et al, 2005;Liu et al, 2006;Cui et al, 2007), and biosupport vector machine which is modified from a conventional support vector machine by introducing a biobasis function so that the non-numerical attributes of amino acids can be recognized without a feature extraction process (Yang and Johnson, 2005). Recently a structure-and sequence-based method was reported, in which residue-based energy terms from the molecular dynamics simulations are used as features to train SVM prediction models for peptide/MHC class I binding (Antes et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%