2010
DOI: 10.3109/00207450903389156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Brain MRI after Deep Brain Stimulation Hardware Implantation

Abstract: The objective of this study was to examine the experience with and safety of brain 1.5 Tesla (T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in deep brain stimulation (DBS) patients. This was a retrospective review of brain MRI scanning performed on DBS patients at the University of Kansas Medical Center between January 1995 and December 2007. A total of 249 DBS patients underwent 445 brain 1.5 T MRI scan sessions encompassing 1,092 individual scans using a transmit-receive head coil, representing the cumulative scanning… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We corroborate previous problem-free use of MRI in implanted patients for structural [21], [22], [23] as well as functional [28], [30], [32] imaging. According to our phantom experiments, fMRI carries a lower risk of thermal damage than conventional T1 – or T2 –weighted imaging which is also in agreement with previous observations [26], [97].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We corroborate previous problem-free use of MRI in implanted patients for structural [21], [22], [23] as well as functional [28], [30], [32] imaging. According to our phantom experiments, fMRI carries a lower risk of thermal damage than conventional T1 – or T2 –weighted imaging which is also in agreement with previous observations [26], [97].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…On the other hand, an MRI is often used by many implantation teams for confirming the position of implanted electrodes, or for structural brain imaging in cases of postoperative complications. Nevertheless, its use in hundreds of implanted patients [21], [22], [23] may serve as evidence that with adherence to defined precautions [24], [25] an MRI can be considered safe even in the presence of an intracerebral electrode [26]. The same applies to fMRI which can be used for detection of local as well as distant effects of DBS on the cerebral cortex [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduction of the maximum allowed SAR value went from 0.4 W/kg to 0.1 W/kg in 2005, which is well below the U.S. Food and Drug Administration permitted whole‐body and local head SAR limits. Recent reports have provided evidence that the strict restriction on SAR is unreasonable and provides poor quality MRI images that may hinder clinical outcomes …”
Section: Specific Absorption Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imaging with an MRI or CT scan can assess various surgical complications such as hemorrhage, edema, infarction, and brain shift . However, there is still an ongoing debate about which imaging modality provides the most precise information about electrode position . Proper electrode placement is important for effective therapeutic effect; if an electrode lead is misplaced it may be the cause of poor therapeutic results.…”
Section: Imaging Modalities For Dbs Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All surgical tools needed to be MRI compatible, including an MRI-compatible drill. The risk of severe injury with the lead inserted into the brain when a 1.5-T MRI scan is performed has been already reported but has to be counterbalanced with the large number of patients in whom MRI scans, using head coils, have been performed also without any problems [4,6,16,25]. While some isolated MR complications occurred in implanted patients, with the need to modify safety rules [7,9,21], many teams reported accuracy, innocuousness, and advantages of its use.…”
Section: Feasibility and Technical Requirementmentioning
confidence: 99%