1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0266-4356(97)90680-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of buccal fat pad to repair intraoral defects: review of 30 cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
74
1
7

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
74
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The average weight of each fat pad is around 9.3 gm and its average volume is 9.6 ml [7]. The size of the buccal pad of fat is fairly constant among different individuals regardless of the overall body weight and fat distribution [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The average weight of each fat pad is around 9.3 gm and its average volume is 9.6 ml [7]. The size of the buccal pad of fat is fairly constant among different individuals regardless of the overall body weight and fat distribution [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is being used as pedicled graft in facial augmentation procedures, repair of persistent oro-antral fistulae after dental extractions, treatment of oral submucous fibrosis [4,12] reconstruction of medium sized maxillectomy defects from premolar to tuberosity region, and repair of defects of soft and hard palate [12], cheek mucosa, retromolar trigone [13], tonsillar defects [2]. It can also be used in combination with temporalis flap for larger defects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Extraction of third molar tooth is required to avoid flap inclination between teeth. 24,[30][31][32][33] Buccal fat pad by virtue of its anatomic position and the ease with which it can be accessed and mobilized without causing any noticeable defect in the cheek or mouth was felt to be a reliable interposition material. The procedure, considering the anatomic proximity of the donor and the recipient site, is not a prolonged one.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%