2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.vascn.2005.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of canalicular membrane vesicles (CMVs) from rats, dogs, monkeys and humans to assess drug transport across the canalicular membrane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
25
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
25
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The study by Zelcer et al (2003), similarly to our data, showed cooperative interaction with lower affinities (K 0.5 ϭ 120 M). A study using human canalicular membrane vesicles showed Michaelis-Menten type kinetics with a K m of 364 M (Shilling et al, 2006). For rat protein classic Michaelis-Menten type kinetics was shown (Borst et al, 2006b).…”
Section: Heré Di-szabó Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The study by Zelcer et al (2003), similarly to our data, showed cooperative interaction with lower affinities (K 0.5 ϭ 120 M). A study using human canalicular membrane vesicles showed Michaelis-Menten type kinetics with a K m of 364 M (Shilling et al, 2006). For rat protein classic Michaelis-Menten type kinetics was shown (Borst et al, 2006b).…”
Section: Heré Di-szabó Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of them demonstrated a sigmoidal transport with a Hill number of 1.16 (Ninomiya et al, 2005; also reviewed in Borst et al, 2006b), whereas the other group calculated a Hill number of 1.5 (Gerk et al, 2004). The reported K m values range from single digit Ito et al, 2001) through double digit (Borst et al, 2006b) to triple digit numbers (Shilling et al, 2006). Our data are similar to results obtained using rat Mrp2-Sf9 for which MichaelisMenten type kinetics and double digit K m (K m ϭ 16 M) was found (Borst et al, 2006b).…”
Section: Heré Di-szabó Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Even though the interspecies scaling methods based on physiologically allometric procedures have been successfully applied, particularly into extrapolation of hepatic enzymatic metabolism and urinary excretion (Dedrick et al, 1970;Iwatsubo et al, 1997;Ito et al, 1998), the in vitro or in vivo model for biliary excretion predication is far from being mature (Mahmood and Sahajwalla, 2002). The remarkable interspecies differences in biliary excretion of xenobiotics and drugs/metabolites (Ishizuka et al, 1999;Shilling et al, 2006) may cause significant overestimation of biliary excretion in humans simply by an exponential allometric extrapolation approach (Lave et al, 1999;Pahlman et al, 1999;Ayrton and Morgan, 2001). Therefore, understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying the marked species difference in hepatobiliary elimination of drugs and their metabolites should greatly advance the current allometric scaling models for estimation of human pharmacokinetics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%