2012
DOI: 10.1002/hup.2248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of cannabis enhances attentional inhibition

Abstract: This is the first study to show that attentional inhibition is enhanced in cannabis users. More research is needed to determine whether greater inhibition represents an advantage or disadvantage for visual search performance of cannabis users.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Gilman et al (12) found that increased risk-taking behavior in CB users depended on stimulus type with greater risk-taking observed when the rewards were social, health/safety, and ethical factors but not when the rewards were monetary. A study by Vivas et al (11) found that CB use actually enhanced inhibitory control compared to non-users. Another study used transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to stimulate the left and right dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in chronic cannabis users and controls and found that chronic cannabis users made more conservative decisions than controls during sham stimulation (placebo) but during active stimulation of the right DLPFC, controls made more conservative decisions while activations of both right and left DLPFC in cannabis users led to increased risk-taking (13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Gilman et al (12) found that increased risk-taking behavior in CB users depended on stimulus type with greater risk-taking observed when the rewards were social, health/safety, and ethical factors but not when the rewards were monetary. A study by Vivas et al (11) found that CB use actually enhanced inhibitory control compared to non-users. Another study used transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to stimulate the left and right dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in chronic cannabis users and controls and found that chronic cannabis users made more conservative decisions than controls during sham stimulation (placebo) but during active stimulation of the right DLPFC, controls made more conservative decisions while activations of both right and left DLPFC in cannabis users led to increased risk-taking (13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the chronic use of alcohol and other drugs of addiction have been associated with increased risk-taking behaviors and poor inhibitory control (9), CB use has not consistently been found to be linked to increased risk-taking (10,11). For example, Gilman et al (12) found that increased risk-taking behavior in CB users depended on stimulus type with greater risk-taking observed when the rewards were social, health/safety, and ethical factors but not when the rewards were monetary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results suggest that the IOR of poker players is enhanced compared to that of controls. This type of result has already been observed in a population of cannabis users (Vivas, Estevez, Moreno, Panagis, & Flores, 2012) (see (Colzato & Hommel, 2009) for opposite results) and cocaine users after taking a dose of dextroamphetamine (Fillmore, Rush, & Abroms, 2005). The enhanced IOR found in these populations suggests that the IOR can be improved by the ingestion of drugs, such as cannabis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The enhanced IOR found in these populations suggests that the IOR can be improved by the ingestion of drugs, such as cannabis. Nevertheless, the mechanisms are still not understood ( Vivas et al., 2012 ). Other studies, gathered in a systematic review, have assessed the effect of alcohol, ecstasy, and hallucinogens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Speed of visual information processing during simple target detection tasks, may remain intact in the face of cannabis use [68,69], and in some cases may actually provide functional advantage for target detection because of faulty inhibition [70]. However, with more complex tasks of selective and divided visual attention, cannabis users tend to be significantly slower to detect both central and peripheral visual stimuli [48].…”
Section: Visual Attentionmentioning
confidence: 98%