2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of capsule endoscopy in children with primary intestinal lymphangiectasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies of adult patients have revealed that CE is superior to the small bowel series for evaluating the small intestine [1][2][3]. A number of recent studies on pediatric patients have demonstrated that CE is also a useful in children with abdominal complaints, although the application of CE in this patient population has received relatively less attention compared to the adult patient population [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. The indications for CE in both children and adults include obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB), Crohn's disease (CD), and lymphangiectasia; in adults, suspected tumors of the small bowel also suggest the need for CE [9,[12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of adult patients have revealed that CE is superior to the small bowel series for evaluating the small intestine [1][2][3]. A number of recent studies on pediatric patients have demonstrated that CE is also a useful in children with abdominal complaints, although the application of CE in this patient population has received relatively less attention compared to the adult patient population [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. The indications for CE in both children and adults include obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB), Crohn's disease (CD), and lymphangiectasia; in adults, suspected tumors of the small bowel also suggest the need for CE [9,[12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has significant shortcomings as the lymphatics maybe dilated only post prandial and not visualized when the endoscopy and biopsy were performed [3]. In addition if the region of small bowel involvement is distal to the duodenum this approach would give a falsely normal result [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. This aspect assumes more significance as it's the patients who have localized involvement, benefit most from a definitive surgery wherein the involved segment would be removed and the patient would lead a normal life, with normal no dietary restrictions thereafter [13][14][15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost and availability of VCE continue to be a hindrance to its widespread usage as well. Imaging with MRI has been used as non-invasive diagnostic tools and also for excluding other factors that may cause secondary IL [5,[8][9][10]16,17]. The usage of MRI has an inherent advantage over CT and VCE but its findings and utility in children with IL have been rarely reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Endoscopic and biopsy findings may be normal in case of local and segmental involvement. In this case, the segment with lymphangiectasia may be found using video capsule endoscopy (25). Enlarged and marked intestinal and mesenteric lymphatics may be also evaluated using computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MR) (1,11).…”
Section: Increased Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%