2010
DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agq006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Carbohydrate-Deficient Transferrin (CDT) and a Combination of GGT and CDT (GGT-CDT) to Assess Heavy Alcohol Consumption in Traffic Medicine

Abstract: A relevant proportion of drivers with high BAC are chronic abusers. GGT-CDT, previously validated with CDT immunoassays, should not be applied to traffic medicine in its current form and its performances re-evaluated with CDT measured by HPLC.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
14
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Disialotransferrin is one of the minor glycoforms of human transferrin, and the percentage of total CDT that is disialotransferrin, as determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), is the recommended method for measuring %CDT [9]. The percent of abstainers and moderate drinkers combined that tested %CDT positive (i.e., the percent false positive, or one minus the specificity of the test) using a cutoff of 1.8% was 0% in Italy [10] and Sweden [9] and 5.6% in a multi-national study [6]. In the latter study, the specificity was 100% when moderate drinkers were excluded, and the authors noted that errors in self-report were likely among the moderate drinkers [6].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disialotransferrin is one of the minor glycoforms of human transferrin, and the percentage of total CDT that is disialotransferrin, as determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), is the recommended method for measuring %CDT [9]. The percent of abstainers and moderate drinkers combined that tested %CDT positive (i.e., the percent false positive, or one minus the specificity of the test) using a cutoff of 1.8% was 0% in Italy [10] and Sweden [9] and 5.6% in a multi-national study [6]. In the latter study, the specificity was 100% when moderate drinkers were excluded, and the authors noted that errors in self-report were likely among the moderate drinkers [6].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A compound known as carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) is the most well known among those being studied as a biomarker for excessive alcohol use 63,64. Although liver enzymes are often elevated in individuals who drink excessively, their usefulness as a screening tool is limited by their lack of ethanol specificity.…”
Section: Recent Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, the upper limit of GGT was obtained exactly in the same way as for CDT; the 95% confidence interval for GGT obtained in the apparently healthy nondrinkers was 61 U/l. It is well-known that a combination of CDT and GGT, namely GGT-CDT, can have higher sensitivity than single markers alone in detecting excessive drinkers [16]. Although MCV is often included in the current standards of biomarkers for excessive drinking, sensitivity of MCV in detection of habitual drinkers is lower than those of GGT as demonstrated in several reports [17,18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%