2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.04.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of catalytic oxidation and dehydrogenation of hydrocarbons reactions to highlight improvement of heat transfer in catalytic metallic foams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Very few reports have been published in the literature on structured systems applied to the oxidative dehydrogenation reaction at low temperatures and most of them are mainly devoted to propane [20,21]. Therefore, the development of non-conventional reactor configurations leading to an increasing energy efficiency and the optimization of the reaction temperature control as well as to higher values of activity and/or selectivity looks like an interesting challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very few reports have been published in the literature on structured systems applied to the oxidative dehydrogenation reaction at low temperatures and most of them are mainly devoted to propane [20,21]. Therefore, the development of non-conventional reactor configurations leading to an increasing energy efficiency and the optimization of the reaction temperature control as well as to higher values of activity and/or selectivity looks like an interesting challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because h cond ≫ h conv , structured beds transfer more heat in smaller volumes, minimizing reactor dimensions, which respects the principles of process intensification . Even for highly exothermic and endothermic reactions, these beds operate isothermally, which is ideal to study reaction kinetics …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several plausible hypotheses have been suggested in the literature to account for the enhanced C–H activation using plasma–catalyst combinations: (1) gas-phase electron impact-regulated hydrocarbon dissociation caused by the plasma, , (2) the generation of increased temperature catalytic sites, , (3) the direct interaction between active metal surfaces and the plasma, ,,, and (4) packed-bed effects due to enhanced electric fields from the use of porous dielectric materials. ,,, However, although these postulations have been previously suggested, there are only a few reports that have explored the relative contributions of these phenomena to plasma-driven C–H activation assisted by catalysts. ,,, …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possible contributor to the CH 4 activation enhancement is the generation of surface catalytic sites at higher temperatures compared to the bulk gas temperature due to DBD plasma filaments heating the catalytic surface. , To verify the temperature in the reactor, we performed melting point studies with antimony to determine if the DBD plasma created higher surface temperatures, which would melt antimony at lower bulk temperatures than nonplasma experiments (Figure S5). These experiments provided evidence that the DBD plasma increased the bulk reactor temperature by only ∼10 K or less.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%