2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of cefepime for the treatment of infections caused by extended spectrum β-lactamase–producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
20
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Cefepime is more stable to hydrolysis by ESBLs than the 3GCs [21]; however, the rate of resistance to this fourth-generation cephalosporin (76%) was considerably high in this study. This antibiotic has been administered in recent years and widely used against different infections in Iran.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 45%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cefepime is more stable to hydrolysis by ESBLs than the 3GCs [21]; however, the rate of resistance to this fourth-generation cephalosporin (76%) was considerably high in this study. This antibiotic has been administered in recent years and widely used against different infections in Iran.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…Following carbapenems, the lowest rates of resistance in ESBLproducing isolates were observed for amikacin (21 Prevalence of bla SHV , bla TEM , and bla CTX-M genes and sequencing results PCR showed that 55.7% (n = 58), 30.7% (n = 32) and 45.2% (n = 47) of isolates contained bla SHV , bla TEM , and bla CTX-M genes, respectively. Coexistence of these genes was detected in 26 (34.7%) of isolates.…”
Section: Resistance Of K Pneumoniae Isolatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar scenario was also observed with cefepime, for which there was no change of susceptibility breakpoints in the CLSI 2010 guidelines [10], resulting in some ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae isolates being reported as susceptible to cefepime. Clinical use of cefepime or third-generation cephalosporins with lower MICs (≤8 mg/L for cefepime and ≤4 mg/L for ceftazidime) for the treatment of infections caused by ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates has been studied [8,21,[24][25][26][27]. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies on third-generation cephalosporins and cefepime for the treatment of infections caused by ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates clearly demonstrated that the target attainment rates of these agents was almost 100% for isolates with MICs of ≤2 mg/L, <60% for isolates with MICs of 4 mg/L and 1% for isolates with MICs of 8 mg/L [27][28][29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some clinical studies have reported successful treatment using cefepime in cases of ESBL-producing bacterial infection [19, 35]. However, several other studies have shown disappointing outcomes when using cefepime to treat bacteremic conditions [20, 23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%