Background:Resistance to antibiotics is steadily increasing. Ceftaroline has a broad
spectrum of activity against clinically relevant gram-positive strains
including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.Objectives:This systematic review was conducted to evaluate whether ceftaroline is
effective and safe, leading to a lower rate of treatment failures than
comparators.Material and methods:Studies were included if they were comparing the efficacy and safety of
ceftaroline with other antibiotics.Data sources:Using the search terms ‘ceftaroline’ or ‘ceftaroline fosamil’, a search
strategy was developed. The efficacy endpoint was the rate of treatment
failure, while the safety endpoint was the incidence of adverse events.
Heterogeneity bias was estimated using the Q-test, and
publication bias was estimated using Egger’s test. Null hypothesis was
rejected if p value was less than 0.05.Results:Only 10 studies were included.Synthesis of results:The risk of treatment failure was significantly lower for ceftaroline than
for comparators, and cumulative meta-analysis showed that the effect size
was relevant and precise. Pooled risk ratio was 0.79 (95% confidence
interval = 0.65–0.95). The rates of adverse events were similar among the
studies, and there were no statistically significant differences between
groups. For this endpoint, there was a significant heterogeneity among
studies (p = 0.03). Pooled risk ratio for adverse events
was 0.98 (95% confidence interval = 0.87–1.10), without a statistical
difference.Discussion:The risk of treatment failure was significantly lower for ceftaroline than
comparators, while the rate of adverse events was similar. To the best of
our knowledge, this is the first systematic review on the efficacy and
safety of ceftaroline including children and adults. A limitation is that no
randomized controlled trials were found in non-complicated skin- and
soft-tissue infection and non-community-acquired pneumonia infections; only
few cases with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
isolations and no patients admitted to the intensive care unit were
evaluated.Interpretation:Ceftaroline may be an option of treatment in complicated skin- and
soft-tissue infection and community-acquired pneumonia.