1999
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199912000-00015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Circumflex Scapular Vessels as a Recipient Pedicle for Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Report of 40 Consecutive Cases

Abstract: The use of the circumflex scapular pedicle as a recipient vessel for breast reconstruction in a series of 40 consecutive cases in 37 patients is reported. There were 3 bilateral reconstructions and 34 unilateral reconstructions. Twenty-one cases were immediate reconstructions, and 19 cases were secondary reconstructions. The diameter of the artery varied from 1.5 mm to 3 mm and systematically matched with the diameter of the epigastric artery. The artery was a branch of the subscapular system in 82.5 percent o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice is largely up to the reconstructive surgeon and usually based on comfort level and experience, flow characteristics, chest topography, and patient comorbidities. The recent trend in literature claimed the use of IMV as recipient vessels (Lantieri et al, ; Moran, Nava, Behnam, & Serletti, ; Serletti, Moran, Orlando, & Fox, ), even if some authors note unpredictable quality and inconsistency of the internal mammary veins diameter at the level of the fourth rib often necessitating vein grafts (Lorenzetti, Kuokkanen, von Smitten, & Asko‐Seljavaara, ). Time for vessels' dissection and exposure in immediate reconstruction represents an issue in favor of the axillary vessels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice is largely up to the reconstructive surgeon and usually based on comfort level and experience, flow characteristics, chest topography, and patient comorbidities. The recent trend in literature claimed the use of IMV as recipient vessels (Lantieri et al, ; Moran, Nava, Behnam, & Serletti, ; Serletti, Moran, Orlando, & Fox, ), even if some authors note unpredictable quality and inconsistency of the internal mammary veins diameter at the level of the fourth rib often necessitating vein grafts (Lorenzetti, Kuokkanen, von Smitten, & Asko‐Seljavaara, ). Time for vessels' dissection and exposure in immediate reconstruction represents an issue in favor of the axillary vessels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Good volume [130] Reliable blood supply [130] Free TRAM flaps can create reconstructions that are as aesthetically pleasing as DIEP flaps [131] Greater abdominal wall morbidity than DIEP flaps resulting in hernia (2.6%) or abdominal bulge (3.8%), especially in obese patients Decreased abdominal wall strength [129,121] Common methods of breast reconstruction post-mastectomy Latissimus Dorsi flap Robust blood supply [130,131] Good salvage option for re-operations [130,131] A readily available option for almost all patients [131] Limited volume compared to DIEP and TRAM flaps …”
Section: Trammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly used recipient vessel with proven reliability [14,83,116,120,121]. Does not preclude future CABG.…”
Section: Disadvantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Si on peut conclure à une supériorité de l'artère et de la veine mammaire interne en reconstruction immédiate cela est plus difficile en reconstruction secondaire où on retrouve souvent une artère calcifiée et fragile avec des veines friables en particulier du côté gauche. Nous avions décrit le branchement sur le pédicule circonflexe scapulaire montrant qu'il était constant et fiable [7]. Le pédicule circonflexe scapulaire même s'il n'est plus notre premier choix reste un pédicule utilisé soit lorsque le pédicule mammaire interne n'est pas de bonne qualité mais aussi lorsqu'il y a une thrombose ceci permettant de refaire l'anastomose sur des vaisseaux donneurs de bonne qualité.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified