Proceedings Frontiers in Education 35th Annual Conference 2005
DOI: 10.1109/fie.2005.1611913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of classroom presenter in engineering courses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Having used this capability in the EI-100 course, we have had much success in energizing the class and increasing student participation in classroom activities since upon displaying the submission, the rest of the teams are asked to verify its correctness, seek an optimal solution, or propose alternative solutions. Students were very eager to participate in these types of exercises as reported elsewhere (Anderson et al, 2005;Kowalski et al, 2007;Tront, Eligeti, & Prey, 2006;Wise et al, 2006). Tools for solving engineering problems have become computer-based over recent years.…”
Section: Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Having used this capability in the EI-100 course, we have had much success in energizing the class and increasing student participation in classroom activities since upon displaying the submission, the rest of the teams are asked to verify its correctness, seek an optimal solution, or propose alternative solutions. Students were very eager to participate in these types of exercises as reported elsewhere (Anderson et al, 2005;Kowalski et al, 2007;Tront, Eligeti, & Prey, 2006;Wise et al, 2006). Tools for solving engineering problems have become computer-based over recent years.…”
Section: Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In EI-100 we utilized InkSurvey, a web-based tool developed specifically to allow an instructor to pose open-ended questions to students during class and receive real-time student responses (Kowal-ski, Kowalski, & Hoover, 2007 & Simon, 2005). Each EI-100 instructor uses CATs to gauge student learning in real time and makes real-time pedagogical adjustments as needed.…”
Section: Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a qualitative analysis of lecturer perceptions of their tablet lectures, Van Oosteveen & Muirhead (2007) discovered four main themes: (1) "enhancing mobility of faculty" (meaning mobility of faculty across different campuses, and also the mobility of the small, lightweight tablet which encouraged alternative tablet use such as note-taking during academic meetings); (2) "transforming the development of learning materials in and out of class" (i.e., half of lecturers prepared pre-lecture 'handwritten' notes with the tablet; lecturers also prepared slides with overlaid graphics that could be annotated during the lecture); (3) "enhancing faculty feedback to students" (particularly written comments on student assignments); and (4) "altering instructional pacing during lectures" (i.e., slowing lecture pace). Anderson, Anderson, McDowell & Simon (2005) developed tablet PC presentation software, called Classroom Presenter, which supports digital inking. They summarised common tablet digital inking by lecturers to include: "attentional marks for emphasizing slide content"; "short written phrases for emphasis"; "spontaneous written examples"; "diagrams used for explanation"; "annotation of diagrams on slides"; and "planned activities such as writing lists or filling in tables".…”
Section: Lecturer Experiences Of Tablet Pc Lecturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only way of attracting students' attention was the laser pointer which is hardly visible in huge lecture halls. These were the main reasons that encouraged the development of interactive presentation systems that would support things like attention catching marks for emphasizing slide content, writing illustrating examples, annotating diagrams, drawings or pictures as well as promoting the audience interaction [1]. That means the system that can give audience the possibility to interfere directly with the presentation itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%