2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of cluster analysis and preference mapping to evaluate consumer acceptability of choice and select bovine M. Longissimus Lumborum steaks cooked to various end-point temperatures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, European consumers were classified into several segments based on their acceptance of boar taint, and one of the consumer segments was characterized as ‘boar meat lovers’ . Consumer acceptance was also distinguished based on the preference for grass‐fed beef and for beef longissimus steaks cooked to different levels of doneness …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, European consumers were classified into several segments based on their acceptance of boar taint, and one of the consumer segments was characterized as ‘boar meat lovers’ . Consumer acceptance was also distinguished based on the preference for grass‐fed beef and for beef longissimus steaks cooked to different levels of doneness …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schmidt et al (2010) have used preference mapping to study the effect of cooking temperatures in beef steaks while Prescott et al (2001) evaluated beef to which selected flavour compounds were added to simulate lamb.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…measurement method, sensory panel, cooking method, doneness of the steaks, and shear apparatus (Destefanis et al, 2008;Schmidt et al, 2010). Subjective factors including former consumption experiences, personal preferences, habits, social influences, and available information contributed to low correlation coefficients (Van Wezemael et al, 2013).…”
Section: Sensory Tenderness and Sf Spearman Correlation Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%