2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0041-1345(03)00687-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of combined treatment of hepatitis B immune globulin and lamivudine as prevention of hepatitis B virus recurrence in liver allograft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regardless, in this study, similar percentages of patients had transient detection of serum HBV DNA whether given HBIg or not. The protection from graft reinfection by adefovir dipivoxil in this or smaller studies29–32 compares favorably with the protection of patients given HBIg,8–11, 25 lamivudine monotherapy with or without a short course of HBIg,15, 16, 33–38 or ongoing HBIg and lamivudine 17, 30, 34, 39–44. Two caveats, however, must be emphasized: (1) Our study was not designed to compare prospectively the prophylactic efficacy of adefovir dipivoxil with or without HBIg, and (2) the median follow‐up of patients after receiving an on‐study transplant was only 36 weeks, which is insufficient to conclude definitively that long‐term protection was equivalent between the 2 groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Regardless, in this study, similar percentages of patients had transient detection of serum HBV DNA whether given HBIg or not. The protection from graft reinfection by adefovir dipivoxil in this or smaller studies29–32 compares favorably with the protection of patients given HBIg,8–11, 25 lamivudine monotherapy with or without a short course of HBIg,15, 16, 33–38 or ongoing HBIg and lamivudine 17, 30, 34, 39–44. Two caveats, however, must be emphasized: (1) Our study was not designed to compare prospectively the prophylactic efficacy of adefovir dipivoxil with or without HBIg, and (2) the median follow‐up of patients after receiving an on‐study transplant was only 36 weeks, which is insufficient to conclude definitively that long‐term protection was equivalent between the 2 groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, the data for the efficacy of long‐term LAM therapy in patients with decompensated liver disease associated with viral replication, liver function and safety profile are limited to date. LAM is also effective for the treatment of recurrent hepatitis B infection after transplantation, based on improvement in virological parameters of infection as well as clinical and histological manifestations of the disease 10,11 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have attempted to replace long‐term HBIG with active immunization after varying durations of HBIG, with conflicting results 16–19. Others have tried to lower the cost of HBIG by administering it intramuscularly (IM) at lower doses 20–25. Finally, other investigators have tried to discontinue HBIG altogether after the initial post‐OLT period and continue with antiviral monotherapy in patients at low risk for HBV recurrence (hepatitis B e antigen [HBeAg] negative with undetectable HBV DNA by non–polymerase chain reaction [PCR]‐based assays at transplant), with recurrence rates varying from 0 to 16% 26–28.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%