1969
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-196902000-00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Composite Ear Grafts in Correction of the Short Nose

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 For moderate (3-to 5-mm foreshortened nose) and severe (more than 5 mm) nasal shortening, a combination of maneuvers is necessary. Septal lengthening techniques include the double-sided composite conchal graft, dissected through the vertical axis to provide septal lengthening and lengthening of the vestibular lining 11 ; the placement of cartilage L-struts, as well as the DARTT (dynamic adjustable rotation tip tensioning) technique 12 ; and a more direct solution, with the single-sided composite conchal graft. 13 With the scarcity of usable septal cartilage in the shortened nose, techniques have been described that depend on other autologous cartilage sources and the rearrangement of autogenous nasal tissue, including septal cartilage rearrangement with costal cartilage struts along the bridge into the columella, 14 release of the upper lateral cartilages from the septum followed by repositioning and fixation with batten grafts derived from either septal or conchal cartilage, 15,16 gull wing conchal grafts paired with costochondral dorsal onlay grafts, 2 and the placement of two caudal extending spreader grafts affixed to the septum with a columellar strut between the medial crura (the tongue-and-groove technique).…”
Section: Surgical Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 For moderate (3-to 5-mm foreshortened nose) and severe (more than 5 mm) nasal shortening, a combination of maneuvers is necessary. Septal lengthening techniques include the double-sided composite conchal graft, dissected through the vertical axis to provide septal lengthening and lengthening of the vestibular lining 11 ; the placement of cartilage L-struts, as well as the DARTT (dynamic adjustable rotation tip tensioning) technique 12 ; and a more direct solution, with the single-sided composite conchal graft. 13 With the scarcity of usable septal cartilage in the shortened nose, techniques have been described that depend on other autologous cartilage sources and the rearrangement of autogenous nasal tissue, including septal cartilage rearrangement with costal cartilage struts along the bridge into the columella, 14 release of the upper lateral cartilages from the septum followed by repositioning and fixation with batten grafts derived from either septal or conchal cartilage, 15,16 gull wing conchal grafts paired with costochondral dorsal onlay grafts, 2 and the placement of two caudal extending spreader grafts affixed to the septum with a columellar strut between the medial crura (the tongue-and-groove technique).…”
Section: Surgical Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The double-sided skin composite conchal graft, as mentioned for nasal lengthening, was designed to produce nasal lining. 11 However, the single-sided skin composite graft is most appropriate 13 because of its more minimal technical difficulty and reduced risk of deformity to the donor site.…”
Section: Surgical Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, septal cartilage and auricular cartilage have been used for nasal tip and dorsum augmentation [2,9,10,[13][14][15][16]. In particular, because auricular cartilage is thin and flexible, it is possible to adjust the thickness of the graft by using it in combination, and it is highly useful as a material for dorsum augmentation [3,6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Success was attained in only 25 (53%) of the cases.1·2 Utilization of an auricular composite graft for repair of an ear defect was reported by Lexer in 19063 and, in this country, by Day4 in 1921. The success of Day's procedure was confirmed by his patient's statement that he "liked his new ears better than his original ones."…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 96%