2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2007.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of computer algebra in Hamiltonian calculations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the harmonic oscillation hypothesis adopted for the freely vibrating Timoshenko beam as indicated by Eqs. (31) and (32) and also by the introduction of the non-dimensional length  = x/L, the expressions for the amplitudes of the shear force (V) and bending moment (M) arising from Eqs. (29), (30) and (48) will take the following form.…”
Section: Dynamic Stiffness Matrix Of a Timoshenko Beammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of the harmonic oscillation hypothesis adopted for the freely vibrating Timoshenko beam as indicated by Eqs. (31) and (32) and also by the introduction of the non-dimensional length  = x/L, the expressions for the amplitudes of the shear force (V) and bending moment (M) arising from Eqs. (29), (30) and (48) will take the following form.…”
Section: Dynamic Stiffness Matrix Of a Timoshenko Beammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3), using the  operator, integrating by parts and then collecting terms. In an earlier publication, the entire procedure to generate the governing differential equations of motion and natural boundary conditions for bar or beam type structures was automated by Banerjee et al[31] by applying symbolic computation. In this way, the governing differential equation of motion of the Rayleigh-Love bar is obtained as[7,21] -product of the Hamiltonian formulation, the expression for the axial force f(x, t) follows from the natural boundary condition to give[7,21]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The entire formulation using DSM in this paper is accomplished in the real domain as opposed to previous formulations which used complex arithmetic when developing the element dynamic stiffness matrices [31,32]. Another important further development reported in this paper is the derivation of explicit algebraic expressions for the dynamic stiffness elements using symbolic computation [33][34][35]. The explicit expressions for the dynamic stiffness elements are particularly useful in optimisation studies and also when some, but not all of the stiffnesses are needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substituting T and U from Equations (8) and 9into Equation 11, using the δ operator, integrating each term by parts, and then collecting terms yield the governing differential equations and natural boundary conditions in free vibration of the FGB. The entire procedure has been processed through the application of symbolic computation [12]. The following governing differential equations are eventually obtained as,…”
Section: Property Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kinetic and potential energies of the FGB are then formulated by using the Timoshenko beam theory which accounts for the effects of shear deformation and rotary inertia. Next, the governing differential equations of motion in free vibration are derived using Hamilton's principle and making use of symbolic computation [12]. The expressions for axial force, shear force and bending moment at any crosssection of the FGB are obtained as a by-product of the Hamiltonian formulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%