Use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography and a Laser Intraoral Scanner in Virtual Dental Implant Surgery

Lee, Cameron Y. S.; Ganz, Scott D.; Wong, Natalie Y.; Suzuki, Jon B.

doi:10.1097/id.0b013e31825e5739

Cited by 32 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Images obtained with digital intraoral scanners can be overlapped with CBCT images without using impression materials or plaster models [ 14 ], thus minimizing errors due to the deformation of impression materials and plaster during the setting and fabrication of the radiation guide [ 15 , 16 ]. Accuracy can be confirmed by the fit of the surgical guide in the oral cavity; moreover, intraoral scanning reduces procedure time.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implants

Kim

Jeong

Ryu

et al. 2022

Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Recently developed imaging techniques, such as cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and CAD/CAM technology, have facilitated reliable implant planning and implant surgical guide production by 3D printing. This study compared the accuracy of implant-guided surgery using the R2GATE® program with CBCT before and after surgery. Patients and methods The study included patients who visited the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Chonnam National University Hospital from September 2021 to March 2022. Twenty-four implants were placed in eleven patients. Using R2GATE® Windows (Megagen implant, Daegu, Korea) software, implant placement was planned. The difference was measured by the CBCT before and after surgery. The cervical and apical distance and angular deviation of the implants were measured. Statistical analysis was performed using an independent t-test, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression analyses. Results The three-dimensional linear distance difference between the planned implant and the placed implant was 0.97 ± 0.37 mm at the cervical and 1.13 ± 0.36 mm at the apical. The difference in angle deviation between the planned implant and the placed implant was 3.42 ± 2.12°. Among the variables affecting the accuracy of implant placement, a statistically significant difference was found when using a tissue-supported implant guide, implant diameter and implant length. Conclusion Based on these results, using the R2GATE® program is useful to use an implant digital surgical guide, and it will be used in various clinic.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implants

Kim

Jeong

Ryu

et al. 2022

Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…8) (Patel, 2010). In light of these developments, virtual dental patients (VDPs) that replicate the superficial surface of the skin combined with the underlying bony structures of the skull and teeth including the oral soft tissue layers are needed (Lee et al, 2012;Lin et al, 2013). Creating VDPs under static conditions requires digital data from various tissues to superimpose the 3D media gathered from IOS, CBCT, FS and the CAD/CAM systems.…”

Section: Advantages and Disadvantages Of Virtual Articulatorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Virtual Articulators, Virtual Occlusal Records and Virtual Patients in Dentistry

Ozdemir¹,

Albayrak²,

Yüzbaşıoğlu³

et al. 2021

J Exp Clin Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Digital technology is broadly used in almost every part of medicine. As tools of digital technology, augmented reality and virtual reality have been adopted in all disciplines of dentistry and dental education. In particular, virtual articulators have allowed for a full analysis of occlusion with dental models that can simulate all mandibular movements in static and dynamic positions. When combined with additional software, virtual articulators can also enhance education and practice, allow for quicker and more precise individualized diagnoses and enable discussions of dental treatment planning options with patients during their first appointment. This article reviews the requirements for virtual articulators and occlusal recordings and assesses their advantages and disadvantages in various aspects.

show abstract

“…This comprehensive digital visualization provides essential information about the patient's bone structure, existing teeth, and facial profile, enabling dentists to perform detailed surgical treatment planning even without the presence of the patient. [6][7][8] Moreover, workflows of integrating occlusal information, such as centric relation, vertical dimension of occlusion, and facebow records into virtual patients, have been proposed recently. This allows the use of virtual patient for both surgical planning and the following prosthetic design.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Recommendations for successful virtual patient‐assisted esthetic implant rehabilitation: A guide for optimal function and clinical efficiency

Li,

Joda,

Revilla‐León

et al. 2023

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveComplete arch implant rehabilitation necessitates meticulous treatment planning and high‐level collaboration between surgical and prosthetic dental teams. Emerging virtual technologies hold considerable promise in streamlining this process. The aim of this article is to extend recommendations to clinicians venturing into the virtual patient‐assisted esthetic implant rehabilitation workflow.OverviewThis article summarizes recommendations for virtual patient‐assisted esthetic implant rehabilitation in the following five aspects: three‐dimensional data handling and superimposition, occlusion and virtual articulator integration in creating virtual patients, streamlined face‐ and prosthetic‐driven surgical planning, reuse of presurgical data (“Copy & Paste”), and final impression for passive fitting of final restoration. To illustrate these principles, a case with complete‐mouth implant rehabilitation completed within six visits using this virtual patient workflow is presented.ConclusionThe virtual patient workflow serves as an invaluable tool to perform treatment planning, enhance efficiency, and ensure predictable outcomes in esthetic complete arch implant rehabilitation.Clinical SignificanceVirtual workflows are increasingly prevalent in esthetic implant rehabilitation. Nevertheless, these workflows necessitate a distinct set of knowledge and tools divergent from conventional dentistry practices. This article offers guidelines and recommendations for dental clinicians who are new to this field.

show abstract

Use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography and a Laser Intraoral Scanner in Virtual Dental Implant Surgery

Abstract: STL file data are able to accurately fabricate a stereolithographic model and surgical guide for implant surgery.

Cited by 32 publications

References 25 publications

Accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implants

Accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implants

Virtual Articulators, Virtual Occlusal Records and Virtual Patients in Dentistry

Recommendations for successful virtual patient‐assisted esthetic implant rehabilitation: A guide for optimal function and clinical efficiency

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About