2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of diazoxide in management of severe postprandial hypoglycemia in patient after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The mechanism of action is through the ATP‐sensitive potassium channel, and it inhibits insulin release from beta‐cells. The use of diazoxide for the treatment of postbariatric surgery hypoglycaemia has been described . The side effects are hypotension, fluid retention and hirsutism.…”
Section: Treatment Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanism of action is through the ATP‐sensitive potassium channel, and it inhibits insulin release from beta‐cells. The use of diazoxide for the treatment of postbariatric surgery hypoglycaemia has been described . The side effects are hypotension, fluid retention and hirsutism.…”
Section: Treatment Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several treatments have been proposed in the literature; these involve acarbose (24,25), calcium channel antagonists (nifedipine and verapamil) (26), the somatostatin analogues octreotide (27) and pasireotide (28), the b-cell inhibitor diazoxide (29), and finally and ultimately, partial pancreatectomy (30). Glucagon has been tried as infusion but has not been proven to be useful perhaps because of its concomitantly high levels of insulin (31).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acarbose has been shown to improve metabolic profiles, as mentioned above [34,35]. Diazoxide, a benzothiadiazine derivative, reduced insulin secretion in one patient [38], but in our experience it leads to many adverse side effects. Insulin analogue injection was tested in 10 patients [23], and did not modify the glycaemic profile other than by lowering the glycaemic nadir further (1.9 ± 0.6 vs 2.5 ± 0.8 mmol/l).…”
Section: Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 56%