2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechflu.2017.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of digitally filtered inflow conditions for LES of flows over backward facing steps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, uniform are observed in the first of the separation bubble (). The separated flow then rapidly reaches its strongest level at , which is very close to the value () reported by Chakravarthy, Arora & Chakraborty (2018). As the free shear layer reattaches on the downstream wall (), the turbulent boundary layer recovers and returns to a typical turbulent level ().…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, uniform are observed in the first of the separation bubble (). The separated flow then rapidly reaches its strongest level at , which is very close to the value () reported by Chakravarthy, Arora & Chakraborty (2018). As the free shear layer reattaches on the downstream wall (), the turbulent boundary layer recovers and returns to a typical turbulent level ().…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…As the free shear layer reattaches on the downstream wall (x/δ 0 = 8.9), the turbulent boundary layer recovers and C f returns to a typical turbulent level ( C f = 0.0027). The reattachment length L r ≈ 3.0h is in a good agreement with the previous experimental work by Bolgar et al (2018) and the numerical study by Chakravarthy et al (2018), who reported values of L r = 3.2h and L r = 3.0h, respectively. Compared with the laminar case (blue dotted lines), the mean skin friction further confirms the shorter separation length in the turbulent case.…”
Section: Mean Flow Featuressupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the turbulent case, it can be seen that Lr/h = 2.93 is very close to the reported values, for example, Lr/h = 3.0 reported by Chakravarthy, Arora, and Chakraborty. 47 The root mean square (rms) of the wall pressure prms = √ ⟨p ′ p ′ ⟩/ρ∞u 2 ∞ is plotted in Fig. 5(b), illustrating the level of fluctuations and the generation of turbulence.…”
Section: A Comparison Of Transition Process With Different Initial Disturbance Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statnikov et al [15] study revealed that strong wall pressure fluctuations occur at Sr D ≈0.1, Sr D ≈0.2, and Sr D ≈0. 35 and are associated with the longitudinal cross-pumping motion of the separation bubble, the cross-flapping motion of the shear layer, and the swinging motion of the shear layer, respectively. Further, they identified the shape of the antisymmetric modes at Sr D =0.2, which is primarily responsible for the buffet loads on the nozzle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%