2016
DOI: 10.1161/jaha.115.002776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Valvular Heart Lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
42
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…22, 23 Although recent guidelines recommend using NOACs for non-valvular atrial fibrillation, current research is focused on identifying other potential roles in clinical conditions such as atrial fibrillation associated with valvular heart disease and patients with prosthetic heart valves. 24 Thus, it is possible that the range of indications for NOAC use will expand in the future. 25 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22, 23 Although recent guidelines recommend using NOACs for non-valvular atrial fibrillation, current research is focused on identifying other potential roles in clinical conditions such as atrial fibrillation associated with valvular heart disease and patients with prosthetic heart valves. 24 Thus, it is possible that the range of indications for NOAC use will expand in the future. 25 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] VKAs are highly effective but they have a narrow therapeutic index and they require routine monitoring of the International Normalized Ratio (INR). Over recent years, the oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy scenario has changed as a result of the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAcs) [2,3] and improvements in OAC management with VKAs, including pharmacogenetic (PGx) studies, focused on identifying genetic determinants affecting VKA dose requirements. [46] The best-characterized genes involved in VKA PGx are vitamin K epoxide reductase complex subunit 1 ( VKORC1 ) and cytochrome P450 2C9 ( CYP2C9 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study inclusion criteria were designed to identify a set of AF patients for whom the warfarin‐or‐DOAC question was most applicable (no prior warfarin use, nonvalvular AF). Unfortunately, there is no universally accepted definition of nonvalvular AF that could be applied, and indeed, the 4 major DOAC trials applied slightly different definitions in their respective trials . A previously developed prediction model, the SAMe‐TT 2 R 2 score, was developed with the same intent, though it did not focus specifically on new AF diagnoses .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%