2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.gastre.2021.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of double-layered covered esophageal stents in post-surgical esophageal leaks and esophageal perforation: Our experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the groups of patients included in the studies vary, the rate of successful fistula closure by stenting varies between 63.5 and 100% [16,[22][23][24]. Segura et al in a 2022 study reported fistula healing using a single stent with the covered double-layer metal stent (Niti S™ DOUBLE™ Esophageal Metal Stent Model) in a percentage of 75% and 100% in terms of using the method [25], and Haruštiak et al revealed an efficiency of 84% in closing the fistula by stenting in an average time of 55.7 ± 27.11 days/patient (mean of 39 ± 24.30 days/stent) [26].…”
Section: The Efficiency Of the Methods In The Treatment Of Fistulamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the groups of patients included in the studies vary, the rate of successful fistula closure by stenting varies between 63.5 and 100% [16,[22][23][24]. Segura et al in a 2022 study reported fistula healing using a single stent with the covered double-layer metal stent (Niti S™ DOUBLE™ Esophageal Metal Stent Model) in a percentage of 75% and 100% in terms of using the method [25], and Haruštiak et al revealed an efficiency of 84% in closing the fistula by stenting in an average time of 55.7 ± 27.11 days/patient (mean of 39 ± 24.30 days/stent) [26].…”
Section: The Efficiency Of the Methods In The Treatment Of Fistulamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in the literature have reported stent migration in 10-40% of patients [20,24,25,35,40]. Stent migration rates vary depending on the diameter of the stent, the type of coating, the insertion site and the material used to make the stent [58].…”
Section: Stent Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entre otras causas puede asociarse a procedimientos médicos como la endoscopía digestiva o la colocación de una sonda nasogástrica, enfermedades del esófago, traumatismos penetrante o cerrado, ingestión de objetos extraños y por cáusticos. [3][4][5][6][7] Aun teniendo en cuenta los avances terapéuticos, la morbimortalidad de los eventos de perforación esofágica sigue siendo alta a pesar de cualquier tratamiento endoscópico o conservador. La mortalidad general tras perforación esofágica varía según las diferentes poblaciones alcanzando valores entre 18 y 36%, pudiendo incluso elevarse hasta 90-100% en aquellos que no reciben tratamiento oportuno.…”
unclassified
“…La mortalidad general tras perforación esofágica varía según las diferentes poblaciones alcanzando valores entre 18 y 36%, pudiendo incluso elevarse hasta 90-100% en aquellos que no reciben tratamiento oportuno. [4][5][6][7] Para lograr un manejo adecuado de la perforación esofágica es importante hacer un diagnóstico oportuno en las primeras 24 horas con ayudas imagenológicas y/o endoscópicas, tiempo de evolución de la perforación, evaluación de las condiciones clínicas y antecedentes del paciente para determinar las alternativas de manejo quirúrgico o endoscópico. 1 Asimismo, el manejo conservador con medidas generales de soporte, incluyendo analgesia, antibióticos, inhibidores de la bomba de protones (IBP) y alimentación enteral o parenteral 6 que conduzcan a recuperación satisfactoria.…”
unclassified