2017
DOI: 10.1590/s1806-92902017000700010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in non-ruminant nutrition research

Abstract: -Precise body composition measurements are essential in animal nutrition studies because the impact of treatments is evaluated based on changes in body weight and composition. Various indirect techniques for animal compositional evaluation have been developed and evaluated for applicability in animal nutrition studies. A fast, accurate, minimally invasive method that requires little input is considered the ideal for providing information about the animal. Measurements obtained by dual-energy x-ray absorptiomet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The studies with DXA have as main objective the determination of body or carcass traits that have importance for the meat industry [ 14 ] or animal nutrition [ 15 ]. Comparing the results of DXA studies is not easy because some works focus on predicting the composition based on the amount of chemical or dissected tissues rather than by the proportion, and this way the composition is powerfully described by the carcass weight and not by the DXA value.…”
Section: Imaging Techniques To Assess Carcass and Meat Quality In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies with DXA have as main objective the determination of body or carcass traits that have importance for the meat industry [ 14 ] or animal nutrition [ 15 ]. Comparing the results of DXA studies is not easy because some works focus on predicting the composition based on the amount of chemical or dissected tissues rather than by the proportion, and this way the composition is powerfully described by the carcass weight and not by the DXA value.…”
Section: Imaging Techniques To Assess Carcass and Meat Quality In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we compared the prediction equations we obtained from our data set with those published in the literature (Mitchell et al, 1998a;Mitchell et al, 1998c;Pomar et al, 2001;Mitchell et al, 2003;Pomar et al, 2017;Kipper et al, 2019b). To do this, we applied the published equation to the DXA values of our data set and computed the RMSE of the values predicted using the published equations and the chemically measured values from our study.…”
Section: Statistical Analysis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Medical imaging techniques such as DXA, CT and MRI not only enable repeated measurements of the same individual but also yield more reproducible results than dissections. Among medical imaging techniques, DXA has advantages that make it particularly attractive for application in animal science (Pomar et al, 2017), which mainly include financial and work security aspects. Compared to CT and MRI, DXA is easier to use, has lower instrument and operating costs, a more rapid scan speed, little to no operator bias and requires less image processing, consequently allowing for quick data analyses (Scholz et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Algorithms developed for humans were successfully adjusted with measurements on live sheep to yield high accuracy and precision in predicting carcass composition (R 2 > 0.90; Pearce et al, 2009). However, some limitations of DEXA include the need for extensive calibration with the animal species of interest, the loss of precision with tissue depth and the need of adjustments to predict chemical composition (Pomar et al, 2017).…”
Section: Body Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%