2012
DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.73.8.1137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of electrical stimulation to monitor lumbosacral epidural and intrathecal needle placement in rabbits

Abstract: Neurostimulation was a useful technique to determine correct intrathecal needle placement in rabbits but failed to detect the lumbosacral epidural space when the common technique, used in dogs and cats for the lumbosacral epidural approach, was used.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, we considered that drugs injected into the coccygeal spinal canal could be distributed to the epidural space. Our result was opposite to a previous study where injecting the contrast agent via epidural through the lumbosacral junction resulted in its entry into the subarachnoid space of all 7 rabbits [22].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we considered that drugs injected into the coccygeal spinal canal could be distributed to the epidural space. Our result was opposite to a previous study where injecting the contrast agent via epidural through the lumbosacral junction resulted in its entry into the subarachnoid space of all 7 rabbits [22].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The NST has been previously used to confirm epidural or intrathecal needle placement in humans (Tsui et al 2005), rabbits (Otero et al 2012), and dogs (Otero et al 2014b). In cats, the existing significant difference between the threshold current for motor response when the needle tip is positioned above (1.76 AE 0.34 mA) and below (0.34 AE 0.07 mA) the interarcuate ligament at lumbosacral epidural space (Otero et al 2014a) defined a NST cut off value of 0.7 mA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) and rabbits (Otero et al. ). To the authors’ knowledge, this technique has not been studied in cats.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%