The aim of this study was to re-evaluate archived samples of canine soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) morphologically consistent with peripheral nerve sheath tumors (PNSTs). In each case, an immunohistochemical panel was applied, including α-SMA, calponin, desmin, S-100, GFAP, NSE and Olig2, in order to assess whether the phenotype was consistent with the tumor histological appearance. Additionally, the expression of EGFR, a marker with potential therapeutic implications in malignant PNSTs, was evaluated. Twenty-one tumors were included. Fourteen cases (66.7%) were positive for one or more muscular markers and were reclassifi ed as perivascular tumors (PWTs). A positive labeling for S-100 was observed in one tumor (4.8%), thus classifi ed as PNST. The other 6 tumors were generically classifi ed as poorly differentiated STSs. No unique histopathological feature was observed within the three groups. NSE and Olig2 labeling was aspecifi c and not useful for diagnostic purposes. GFAP was negative in all cases. Six cases (28.6%) were positive for EGFR, including the PNST. Even after the application of a wide immunohistochemical panel, distinguishing between PNSTs and PWTs remains a challenge. Finally, a subgroup of cases cannot be classifi ed based on light microscopy alone.