2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10717-015-9737-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Electron Paramagnetic Resonance for Investigating Glasses and Raw Materials (Review)

Abstract: It is shown that electron paramagnetic resonance can be used to study the fine structure of glasses and glass enamel materials as well as to find and identify defects in glass. The spectra of paramagnetic ions (Cu 2+ , V 4+ , Ti 3+ , Mo 5+ Mn 2+ , Fe 3+ ) are discussed. Specific examples of the detection of these ions in sitals, in which they are introduced as surface-active additives or are present as impurities entering the crystallized glass via the raw materials, are examined. It is determined that the mos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These spectra exhibit a typical powder pattern, characterized by gx = gy = 4.2, gz = 9.3. Based on g-values reported in the literature works [18,19] together with our controlled measurements, we established that these signals originate from the glass substrate itself and not from the other layers. We assigned these spectra to an unexpected Fe 3+ (high-spin, S = 5/2, I = 0) ion, which is octahedrally (six-fold) coordinated with oxygen ions present in the glass substrate.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…These spectra exhibit a typical powder pattern, characterized by gx = gy = 4.2, gz = 9.3. Based on g-values reported in the literature works [18,19] together with our controlled measurements, we established that these signals originate from the glass substrate itself and not from the other layers. We assigned these spectra to an unexpected Fe 3+ (high-spin, S = 5/2, I = 0) ion, which is octahedrally (six-fold) coordinated with oxygen ions present in the glass substrate.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Recently, Bogomolova et al correlated the pair of Cu 2+ EPR parameters (g ∥ and A ∥ ) to the bonding nature of the Cu 2+ ions in some oxide glasses and showed that the parameters for each system of glasses are grouped in definite regions depending on the type of glass former (phosphate, borate, silicate, aluminum borate, etc). 46 The values obtained for our fluorosilicate glass, g ∥ = 2.365 and A ∥ = 140 × 10 −4 cm −1 , lie in the range assigned to Cu 2+ in silicate and lead silicate glasses (Figure 3 in ref 46). This result suggests that the covalency between the copper 3d orbital and the ligand orbitals of our fluorosilicate glass is similar to that found in the lead silicate glasses.…”
Section: H G H S G H S G H S a I S A I Ssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The value for our fluorosilicate glass, α 2 = 0.82, suggests a moderate covalency for the σ-bonding. A comparison of this α 2 value with that derived for Cu 2+ -doped fluorophosphate glasses (α 2 = 0.77–0.81) 43 , fluoroaluminate glasses (α 2 = 0.77), and lead silicate glasses (α 2 = 0.80) indicates the similarity of the copper covalencies of these strong ligand field copper systems. In addition, we verify that the exchange interaction between copper centers in the studied fluorosilicate glass is not significant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…BET, BJH gas V 70 45 400 TGA [31] Thermogravimetric Analysis T mass 65 10 400 FT-IR [32] Fourier Transform Infrared photons photons 62 25 000 (N)IR (Near)Infrared IR IR 61 77 000 MS Mass Spectroscopy molecules ions 50 62 000 TEM [33] Transmission Electron Microscopy e − e − 47 30 500 PSD [34] Particle Size Distribution photons photons 36 26 000 UPS Ultraviolet Photoelectron Spectroscopy UV e − 33 6700 UV-Vis [35] Ultraviolet- [36] Differential Scanning Calorimetry T H 21 11 900 ICP [37] Inductively Coupled Plasma, -MS ions ions 21 12 000 NMR [38] Nuclear Magnetic Resonance mgn fld radio 12 45 000 TPD Temperature Programmed Desorption T mass 12 2800 TPO Temperature Programmed Oxidation T mass 11 2000 XRF [39] X-Ray Fluorescence X-rays X-rays 11 4600 AES Auger Electron Spectroscopy X-rays e − 10 4100 Raman [40] Raman Spectroscopy photons photons 8 37 500 DRIFT Diffuse Reflectance IR Fourier Transform IR IR 6 900 ESR [41] Electron Spin Resonance, EPR photons photons 5 8500 AFM [42] Atomic Force Microscopy distance force 4 18 000 FEM [43] Field journals. A bibliometric map for each technique will give context to the work and identify what scientific disciplines use it.…”
Section: Nature Of Phasesmentioning
confidence: 99%