2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.00977.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of enzymatic methods for rapid enumeration of coliforms in freshwaters

Abstract: I . G EO R GE , M . PE TI T AN D P . SE RVBoth enzymatic activities were compared, respectively, with plate counts of total and faecal coliforms in freshwaters. Enzymatic methods and reference plate counts were significantly correlated in log-log plots. Moreover, the GLUase method allowed the detection of viable (presenting a detectable GLUase activity) but nonculturable Escherichia coli.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

10
86
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
10
86
3
Order By: Relevance
“…GAL and GUD properties of TC and E. coli have been exploited on freshwater (Berg and Fiksdal 1988;Tryland and Fiksdal 1998;George et al 2000;Fiksdal and Tryland 2008) and seawater (Davies et al 1995) …”
Section: Application Of Rapid Enzymatic Assays For Bacterial Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…GAL and GUD properties of TC and E. coli have been exploited on freshwater (Berg and Fiksdal 1988;Tryland and Fiksdal 1998;George et al 2000;Fiksdal and Tryland 2008) and seawater (Davies et al 1995) …”
Section: Application Of Rapid Enzymatic Assays For Bacterial Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another limitation of these techniques is the inability to detect viable but non-culturable bacteria (George et al 2000). Hence, rapid, sensitive and specific assays that provide a near real-time detection of bacterial indicators are of primary importance for monitoring microbiological quality of water.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If clusters of aggregated or particle bound E. coli are present in a sample, culture based methods count clusters as single units thus underestimating the number of cells present whereas enzyme assays account for the activity of each cell thus giving a better representation of the total number of cells present. For these reasons it is difficult to correlate the two approaches although this is commonly done due to a lack of a practical alternative standard reference method [9,12,16]. There is a growing body of evidence pointing to the virulence of VBNC bacteria and suggesting the importance of measuring their numbers in environmental waters [17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Garcia-Armisen [12] using a method from George [16] based on 4-MUG, reports GUS activities of approximately 100 fmol (4-MUG) min 1 per culturable E. coli for lightly contaminated freshwater samples (i.e. 100-1000 E. coli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation