1995
DOI: 10.1016/0952-8180(95)00027-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of esophageal or precordial stethoscopes by anesthesia providers: Are we listening to our patients?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 On the other hand, the stethoscope has been defended as a simple and inexpensive instrument which extends the senses of anaesthesists, who are in fact the most important monitor in themselves. 10,27…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 On the other hand, the stethoscope has been defended as a simple and inexpensive instrument which extends the senses of anaesthesists, who are in fact the most important monitor in themselves. 10,27…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although esophageal stethoscopes have been used for 60 years for continuous auscultation during general anesthesia [4,15,16,17], studies investigating phonocardiographic data as intraoperative hemodynamic parameters or continuous monitoring modalities are still limited. In our previous study, we suggested that intra-operative monitoring of phonocardiogram may provide useful information for non-invasive hemodynamic index [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It took an average of 87 additional seconds to obtain an accurate capnography value compared to PTS auscultation. Second, when placed correctly, the PTS provides immediate acoustic feedback about upper airway caliber and airflow . This is particularly important, as partial or complete airway obstruction is the most common serious sedation‐related adverse event during propofol sedation in children .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%