Scientific and Clinical Applications of Magnetic Carriers 1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-6482-6_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of ESR, Mössbauer Spectroscopy, and Squid-Magnetometry for the Characterization of Magnetic Nanoparticles on the Base of Metal Iron and Its Implications in Vivo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spectra of organs from MNP injected animals exhibit a broad resonance signal centered at about g = 2.2 with a line width of about 1100 Gauss. The shape and field location of this signal are identical to those of the standard MNP suspensions and are consistent with ESR spectra of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles reported in the literature. , As seen by the representative control tissue spectra, the signal intensity contributions from all background sources is negligible compared to that of MNP containing tissues. The only visible signal, seen in the kidney control, is a low-intensity, narrow peak ( g = 2.0, line width p-p = 240 Gauss), which can be attributed to ferritin .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The spectra of organs from MNP injected animals exhibit a broad resonance signal centered at about g = 2.2 with a line width of about 1100 Gauss. The shape and field location of this signal are identical to those of the standard MNP suspensions and are consistent with ESR spectra of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles reported in the literature. , As seen by the representative control tissue spectra, the signal intensity contributions from all background sources is negligible compared to that of MNP containing tissues. The only visible signal, seen in the kidney control, is a low-intensity, narrow peak ( g = 2.0, line width p-p = 240 Gauss), which can be attributed to ferritin .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The chelatable iron concentrations in tissue and blood samples were determined based on the incorporation of LMWI into the iron-desferrioxamine B (Df) complexes with a characteristic ESR spectrum ( fi g. 1 , curve b) upon treatment with Df solution [15,16] . The stored iron concentration in tissues was evaluated against the background of the wide magnetic resonance spectra in the g-factor range of 2.0-4.5 stipulated by ferritin and/or hemosiderin iron [17][18][19] ( fi g. 2 ). The relative methemoglobin (MtHb) iron concentration was estimated using an amplitude A CuEDTA sample of the same shape and size as above, prepared in a 1: 1 water-glycerin matrix, was used as a reference sample.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve the accuracy of the double integration, the ESR lines were simulated as a sum of Lorentzian profi le derivatives after subtraction of the background signal, as shown in fi gure 1 , curves a and b. Calibration curves of the double integrated intensity versus iron concentration were obtained for each of the iron species. The tissue ferritin ESR spectra were calibrated against Mössbauer data [17] .The concentration of transferrin [Tf ] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%