2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.08.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Fe3+ ion probe to study the structural coordination in sodium–lead borophosphate glasses by utilizing electron paramagnetic resonance and optical spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ESR measurements give direct evidence of the paramagnetic color centers in glasses. The ESR intensity of Fe 3+ (g-value around at 4.3) [31] shows an order of 3ω, 2ω and 1ω glass, which is in agreement with the changes of the UV absorption edge as shown in Figures 14 and 15. The signals of PO 3 -EC, PO 4 -EC, POHC defects become apparent after doping with iron or cobalt ions, indicating that cobalt and iron contribute to form these defects.…”
Section: Influence Of Iron and Cobalt On The Defect-state Of Phosphatsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…ESR measurements give direct evidence of the paramagnetic color centers in glasses. The ESR intensity of Fe 3+ (g-value around at 4.3) [31] shows an order of 3ω, 2ω and 1ω glass, which is in agreement with the changes of the UV absorption edge as shown in Figures 14 and 15. The signals of PO 3 -EC, PO 4 -EC, POHC defects become apparent after doping with iron or cobalt ions, indicating that cobalt and iron contribute to form these defects.…”
Section: Influence Of Iron and Cobalt On The Defect-state Of Phosphatsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This is because Fe 2+ does not produce any signals in the EPR. 47,50,51 In addition, the extremely large resonance at g = 2.00 of R-FSPC validated the existence of a copious amount of vacancies and nanopores in this sample compared with those in the FSPC powders. 38,52,53 Further, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was employed to track the electronic states of Fe, Si, and P in the FSPC and R-FSPC hybrids.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The mass-normalized spectrum of FSPC exhibited several superimposed resonances at g = 1.79, 2.00, 2.61, 3.11, and 4.32 (acquired from eq ), thereby proving the existence of abundant Fe 3+ cations. However, the R-FSPC hybrid emanated weak EPR signals at g = 2.00 and 2.13 and a minor asymmetric resonance at g = 4.33, which indicated the presence of a few Fe 3+ ions. This is because Fe 2+ does not produce any signals in the EPR. ,, In addition, the extremely large resonance at g = 2.00 of R-FSPC validated the existence of a copious amount of vacancies and nanopores in this sample compared with those in the FSPC powders. ,, …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The usual X-band EPR signals of Fe 3+ are observed at g ≈ 4.2-4.3, g ≈ 2.2, and g ≈ 2.0 (Kim et al, 2010). Although alternative interpretations exist in the literature for the assignments of these EPR signals, the commonly accepted assignments are as follows: framework iron in a tetrahedral environment and iron oxide species and iron ions coupled by exchange interactions in a distorted octahedral environment, respectively (Srinivasulu et al, 2013;Weckhuysen et al, 2004). Fig.…”
Section: Spectroscopic Characterization Of the Depositsmentioning
confidence: 99%