2021
DOI: 10.1212/cpj.0000000000001059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Figurative Language by People With Parkinson Disease to Describe “Off” Periods

Abstract: BackgroundOFF periods are characterized by the reemergence of motor and non-motor symptoms in individuals with PD and often negatively impact daily functioning. Individuals’ experiences are diverse and may be difficult to articulate; figurative language is often used by patients to describe such experiences. Our objective was to understand how individuals with Parkinson’s Disease (PD) use figurative language to explain OFF periods and how experts interpret such expressions.MethodsIndividuals with self-reported… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(p. 98). This could impact factors such as physician-patient interaction, as was demonstrated by a study into the metaphors used by 86 individuals with Parkinson’s disease for whom their figurative language was not uniformly interpreted and understood by neurologists 27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(p. 98). This could impact factors such as physician-patient interaction, as was demonstrated by a study into the metaphors used by 86 individuals with Parkinson’s disease for whom their figurative language was not uniformly interpreted and understood by neurologists 27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of metaphors was reviewed and a list of themes common to at least two of the metaphors was generated. This method was previously used in a study among individuals with Parkinson’s disease imagining their “off” periods 27 . Classifications were reviewed by authors B.W.F., R.K., A.A.K., and B.R.B., and final classifications were chosen after discussion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%