1995
DOI: 10.2118/26919-pa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Flow Units as a Tool for Reservoir Description: A Case Study

Abstract: Summary This paper presents a method where fluid flow units are used in reservoir description. We developed the proposed method using core and well-log data from the Endicott field on the North Slope of Alaska. Sedimentary intervals of the cored wells are divided into major zones on the basis of core description information. The major zones are further subdivided into subzones to allow less variation in geologic and petrophysical properties within each subzone and more variation between the s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 In the attribute-based approach, specific non-contiguous units sharing similar attributes but not necessarily belonging to the same geological facies are identified by applying a supervised clustering algorithm on the petrophysical well logs and seismic dataset (i.e., Datasets 1-3 in Section 2). Both petroleum geologists and hydro- geologists have attempted to define petrophysical-geological rock units by the capacity of "storage containers" and "flowing conduits" (Ebanks Jr., 1987;Ti et al, 1995). Broadly speaking, the candidate geophysical measured data to undertake unit classification include 3D seismic data, gamma-ray log, density and neutron logs, sonic log, resistivity log, mud log, formation tester log pressure, and fluid sampling data.…”
Section: A Wmp-specific Framework For Identifying Mdrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 In the attribute-based approach, specific non-contiguous units sharing similar attributes but not necessarily belonging to the same geological facies are identified by applying a supervised clustering algorithm on the petrophysical well logs and seismic dataset (i.e., Datasets 1-3 in Section 2). Both petroleum geologists and hydro- geologists have attempted to define petrophysical-geological rock units by the capacity of "storage containers" and "flowing conduits" (Ebanks Jr., 1987;Ti et al, 1995). Broadly speaking, the candidate geophysical measured data to undertake unit classification include 3D seismic data, gamma-ray log, density and neutron logs, sonic log, resistivity log, mud log, formation tester log pressure, and fluid sampling data.…”
Section: A Wmp-specific Framework For Identifying Mdrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FZI is calculated from permeability and porosity values (Ti et al, 1993;Al-Ajmi and Holditch, 2000), the best indicator being permeability and porosity both determined at reservoir overburden stress:…”
Section: Cutoffs For Rock Type Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The input data were conventional core and well log data. The data were compiled and tabulated in two previous studies (Ti et al, 1995;Ratchkovski, 1996). Ratchkovski (1996) used a flow units approach and geostatistical methods to delineate six layers in Zone 2, two layers in Zone 2B and four in Zone 2A.…”
Section: Data Preparation and Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%