2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Four Next-Generation Sequencing Platforms to Determine HIV-1 Coreceptor Tropism

Abstract: HIV-1 coreceptor tropism assays are required to rule out the presence of CXCR4-tropic (non-R5) viruses prior treatment with CCR5 antagonists. Phenotypic (e.g., Trofile™, Monogram Biosciences) and genotypic (e.g., population sequencing linked to bioinformatic algorithms) assays are the most widely used. Although several next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms are available, to date all published deep sequencing HIV-1 tropism studies have used the 454™ Life Sciences/Roche platform. In this study, HIV-1 co-rec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
67
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
3
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a fixed cutoff can retain a large proportion of offspring sequences, introducing skewing from rerepresentation of templates with the abundant Primer ID reads as the apparent templates of offspring Primer IDs. Second, previous studies used the Roche 454 platform, which has a much lower throughput compared to the MiSeq platform used in the present study (21,24,25), which, along with the Ion Torrent platform, has a high error rate at homopolymer runs (26,27) that is not a feature of MiSeq platform. When the number of raw sequence reads per template is not sufficient (due either to low capacity or too much multiplexing), the peak of the Primer ID read distribution will be shifted toward the low-abundance error end, making template recovery significantly less than optimal (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Using a fixed cutoff can retain a large proportion of offspring sequences, introducing skewing from rerepresentation of templates with the abundant Primer ID reads as the apparent templates of offspring Primer IDs. Second, previous studies used the Roche 454 platform, which has a much lower throughput compared to the MiSeq platform used in the present study (21,24,25), which, along with the Ion Torrent platform, has a high error rate at homopolymer runs (26,27) that is not a feature of MiSeq platform. When the number of raw sequence reads per template is not sufficient (due either to low capacity or too much multiplexing), the peak of the Primer ID read distribution will be shifted toward the low-abundance error end, making template recovery significantly less than optimal (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Another study required 2 to 6 cDNA reactions and 5 to 35 separate PCRs to generate libraries for full-genome sequencing on three different NGS platforms (13). The speed of Nextera XT, the tremendous sequence depth, an error rate of 0.1%, and the current read lengths (v3 ϭ 600 nt) obtained on the ubiquitous Illumina MiSeq are also preferable to the time-consuming library amplification steps, lower throughput, and higher error rates associated with other platforms (11,36). We estimate the cost of the m2000 extraction, HIV-SMART library prep, and MiSeq sequencing reagent was approximately $165 per genome for the multiplex run of 23 libraries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The utility of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been demonstrated for a variety of applications related to HIV patient monitoring, including identification of drug resistance mutations (6)(7)(8)(9)(10) and prediction of coreceptor tropism (11,12). Examples generally entail sequencing only of pol or env amplicons, respectively, to a depth necessary to identify low-level variants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of those studies used 454 sequencing, which was limited by homopolymer errors and relative low throughput compared to the Illumina or IonTorrent platform (25). In these studies, the presence of X4 variants was defined by the detection of Ͼ2% of sequences with FPR values of Ͻ3.5% in the viral population, as seen in the MERIT and MOTIVATE cohort studies (12,13,49).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EPD PCR is time-consuming and labor-intensive, making it challenging to analyze more than a few dozen viral genomes per sample (20)(21)(22), which limits the depth of sampling of viral genomes when assessing the complexity of the viral population. Recently, viral population studies have started to incorporate deep-sequencing or next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies that have the capacity to greatly extend the depth of sampling (12,(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28). However, conventional approaches using NGS in HIV-1 population studies have serious limitations in representing an accurate sampling of the original viral population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%