1992
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(92)87140-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of high intensity gas-liquid mixers as reactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pressure drop DP allows the quantification of the dissipated power, thus it has to be lowered for the process to be economically competitive. This parameter depends on superficial liquid and gas velocities, fluid nature (Zhu et al, 1992) and internal geometry.…”
Section: Energy Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pressure drop DP allows the quantification of the dissipated power, thus it has to be lowered for the process to be economically competitive. This parameter depends on superficial liquid and gas velocities, fluid nature (Zhu et al, 1992) and internal geometry.…”
Section: Energy Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to classic mixing or mass transfer processes, they can be used at large gas and liquid flow rates, for fluids of high viscosity, and they do not need much maintenance. Zhu et al (1992) wrote that SM enables the increase of reaction velocities and selectivity. As a consequence, SMs are largely used in industry: liquids or gas homogenisation, dispersion or emulsion with or without reaction in a gas-liquid system, but also heat and mass transfer operations like H 2 S selective absorption in petroleum chemistry (Germain and Wetter, 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 It has been reported that the mass transfer coefficient in high intensity gas-liquid mixers is two orders of magnitude higher than in conventional contactors. 20 Pressure drop, gas holdup, interfacial area and mass transfer coefficients are the important design variables for any such types of gas-liquid contacting equipments. While these parameters have been extensively analyzed and reported for various types of equipment configurations, 21 adequate data is not available for liquid jet gas ejectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%