“…We obtained 11 categories for FHIR implementation. From a platform point of view, we considered the implementation of mobile/tablet apps [ 3 , 9 , 28 , 35 , 39 , 51 , 57 , 60 , 65 , 70 , 72 , 77 , 82 ], standalone apps/servers [ 3 , 23 , 51 , 58 , 61 ], web services/API [ 3 , 11 , 14 , 26 , 34 , 36 , 40 , 48 , 53 , 56 , 71 , 78 ], and web-based tools/applications [ 18 , 26 , 37 , 40 , 42 , 46 , 55 , 69 , 78 ] categories. From a conceptual framework, we considered the categories of general FHIR implementation [ 48 , 59 ], using SMART on FHIR [ 3 , 14 , 22 , 31 ], HL7 API (HAPI)-FHIR server/library/applications [ 14 , 16 , 20 , 32 , 34 - 36 , 40 , 43 , 51 , 54 , 55 , 73 , 76 , 81 , 82 ], and FHIR general framework [ 14 , 40 ,…”