2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11055-020-00940-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Imaginary Lower Limb Movements to Control Brain–Computer Interface Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two main BCI strategies to improve the lives of individuals among stroke patients, i.e., assistive BCI and rehabilitative BCI ( Mane et al, 2020 ). In the last decade, rehabilitative BCI has emerged as one of the promising tools for lower-limb motor function restoration by adjusting neuronal plasticity in affected neural circuits ( Mane et al, 2020 ; Romero-Laiseca et al, 2020 ; Bobrova et al, 2021 ). In the field of BCI, a lower limb exoskeleton control system based on steady state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP) is an efficient BCI system, such as achieved accuracies of 91.3 ± 5.73% and an information transfer rate (ITR) of 32.9 ± 9.13 bits/min ( Kwak et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two main BCI strategies to improve the lives of individuals among stroke patients, i.e., assistive BCI and rehabilitative BCI ( Mane et al, 2020 ). In the last decade, rehabilitative BCI has emerged as one of the promising tools for lower-limb motor function restoration by adjusting neuronal plasticity in affected neural circuits ( Mane et al, 2020 ; Romero-Laiseca et al, 2020 ; Bobrova et al, 2021 ). In the field of BCI, a lower limb exoskeleton control system based on steady state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP) is an efficient BCI system, such as achieved accuracies of 91.3 ± 5.73% and an information transfer rate (ITR) of 32.9 ± 9.13 bits/min ( Kwak et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order for the NES from the EEG to be more consistent with the desired task, it is extremely important to use motor imagery (MI) for the desired action, which causes oscillations in sensorimotor rhythms in the motor regions of the brain [7]. In addition, according to Bobrova et al [8], it has been suggested that BCI systems based on FES s operate on the Hebbian learning principle, where the simultaneous excitation of the motor zones of the cortex during MI and the spinal cord structure stimulated by FES s leads to an improvement in the ability to control the movements of the paralyzed limb. With this association between the computer and the effector systems, better secondary functions are observed in intestinal, urinary, and sexual functions in addition to improvements in flexibility and control of fine motor skills using the limbs [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the possible strategies reported in the literature, the most successful noninvasive BCI paradigms are based on three main approaches: evoked response (P300), steady-state visually evoked potential (SSVEP), and motor imagery (MI) (Lee et al, 2019). However, research on electroencephalogram (EEG) based MI of lower limb movements toward BCI-controlled applications remains relatively scarce (Bobrova et al, 2020;Asanza et al, 2022). Many of these studies have only been tested in offline scenarios due to the complexity of the movements and experimental setups that produce unrealistic EEG signals when compared to experimental setups in online scenarios (Rodríguez-Ugarte et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%