2011
DOI: 10.1038/clpt.2011.122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Inflammatory Markers to Guide Cancer Treatment

Abstract: Patient‐related factors, especially markers of inflammatory response, are prognostic in many common solid cancers. Here we review how such markers, in particular the acute‐phase proteins C‐reactive protein and albumin and a differential white cell count, can predict treatment outcomes in cancer patients. The review examines the literature pertaining to surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy and discusses how inflammatory markers might be incorporated into the planning and monitoring of cancer treatments. Clin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
61
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the combination of hematological components of the systemic inflammatory response, especially the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), has been shown to have prognostic value in patients with a variety of cancers [2]. NLR is inexpensive and can be routinely measured in day-to-day oncological practice [2] and thus could be useful for identifying high-risk patients [3]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the combination of hematological components of the systemic inflammatory response, especially the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), has been shown to have prognostic value in patients with a variety of cancers [2]. NLR is inexpensive and can be routinely measured in day-to-day oncological practice [2] and thus could be useful for identifying high-risk patients [3]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In established cancers, inflammatory symptoms such as fevers, sweats, and weight loss occur commonly, and evidence exists that a systemic inflammatory response is predictive of worse outcomes in a number of malignancies, with earlier cancer recurrence and reduced cancer-specific survival (Clarke et al 2011;Moore et al 2010). Inflammation has also been shown to result in slower clearance of anticancer drugs and worse toxicities Kacevska et al 2008).…”
Section: Inflammationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There is a growing body of evidence supporting the role of the immune response as an important factor in human cancer development and progression (Clarke et al , 2011). Several markers of systemic inflammatory response, such as the pretreatment plasma fibrinogen level, C-reactive protein, neutrophil- or platelet counts, as well as the neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR), have been shown to represent independent prognostic factors in various human cancer types (Clarke et al , 2011; Gondo et al , 2012; Hashimoto et al , 2013; Perez et al , 2013; Pichler et al , 2013a, 2013b; Stotz et al , 2013; Szkandera et al , 2013a; Tanaka et al , 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several markers of systemic inflammatory response, such as the pretreatment plasma fibrinogen level, C-reactive protein, neutrophil- or platelet counts, as well as the neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR), have been shown to represent independent prognostic factors in various human cancer types (Clarke et al , 2011; Gondo et al , 2012; Hashimoto et al , 2013; Perez et al , 2013; Pichler et al , 2013a, 2013b; Stotz et al , 2013; Szkandera et al , 2013a; Tanaka et al , 2014). In particular, the pretreatment NLR might be regarded as an easily measureable and reproducible marker of systemic immune response, having a potential role in renal cell carcinoma as well as in UTUC (Pichler et al , 2013a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%