2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(02)01567-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of ion-trap liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry to screen and confirm drug residues in aquacultured products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A significant advantage of MS n analysis is the reduction of background noise, thus both high specificity and sensitivity can be achieved. Recent studies have demonstrated the use of this type of mass spectrometry on confirmation of veterinary drugs [9,15,20,21]. Thus, LC-QIT-MS was chosen for this screening/confirmatory method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant advantage of MS n analysis is the reduction of background noise, thus both high specificity and sensitivity can be achieved. Recent studies have demonstrated the use of this type of mass spectrometry on confirmation of veterinary drugs [9,15,20,21]. Thus, LC-QIT-MS was chosen for this screening/confirmatory method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of chromatographic methods have been described for quantitative determination of florfenicol in biological fluids. These include gas chromatography [4,5] and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry [6][7][8][9]. More recently, micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatographic separation of florfenicol and florfenicol amine in pharmaceutical formulations has been reported with modified borate buffer containing sodium dodecyl sulphate [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional methods like microbiological methods [5] were not sensitive for CAP and were totally obsolete. Gas/liquid chromatography (GC/LC) [6][7] and gas/liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS/LC-MS) [8][9][10] are internationally recognized but expensive, complicated to operate, and not suitable for detecting lots of samples. Immunoassays including radio immunoassay (RIA) [11], enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [12][13] have been reported frequently to screen CAP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%