“…However, by consulting the MUD alone, there is the risk of obtaining a representation that is not the exact representation of the real situation of the steel industry, due to some weaknesses in the database layout, that, unfortunately, contribute to providing useful but incomplete data: - The database contains information only related to steel slags classified as “waste”; there is no information on slags classified as “by-products” (which, on further investigation, represent, on average, about 30–40% of the annual steel slags production);
- Although the database allows searches to be carried out using the EWC code of interest, it is not possible to distinguish between slag from electric arc furnace (EAF) and slag from ladle furnace (LFS). This is due to the fact that the two types of slag are classified under the same EWC code by most of the steel mills operating in the area, despite the fact that they differ greatly in terms of chemical, physical and mineralogical properties, performance characteristics and fields of application and reuse [ 4 ];
- By analysing sections BD and BE of the database, only partial information can be obtained on the disposal and recovery of slag classified as “waste”. In fact, disposal and recovery are only identifiable by the codes in Legislative Decree 152/2006, Annexes B and C of Part IV, from D1 to D15 for disposal and from R1 to R13 for recovery, respectively [ 55 ].
…”