1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1994.tb04859.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of lamplit roads by foraging bats in southern England

Abstract: Roads illuminated by white streetlamps attracted three times more foraging bats (mostly Pipistrellus pipistrellus) than did roads lit by orange streetlamps or unlit roads (3.2, 1.2 and 0.7 bat passes/km, respectively). More insects flew around white lamps than around orange lamps (mean 0.67 and 0.083 insects per lamp, respectively). The mean number of bat passes recorded in any 1‐km section of road was positively correlated to the number of white streetlamps along the section, and also, independently, to the a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
95
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
95
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In Britain, mean bat activity, likely to be mainly common pipistrelles Pipistrellus pipistrellus, is usually equal to or lower along roads lit by LPS lights than in dark sections, whereas bat activity is higher under HPMV than LPS lights or sections with no light ( Fig. 7.3; Blake et al 1994). Rydell and Racey (1995) …”
Section: Observational Studies On Bats At Street Lightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Britain, mean bat activity, likely to be mainly common pipistrelles Pipistrellus pipistrellus, is usually equal to or lower along roads lit by LPS lights than in dark sections, whereas bat activity is higher under HPMV than LPS lights or sections with no light ( Fig. 7.3; Blake et al 1994). Rydell and Racey (1995) …”
Section: Observational Studies On Bats At Street Lightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This flight-to-light behaviour strongly depends on spectral output of the lighting: white HPMV lamps have a high UV proportion of their spectrum, and so four times as many moths are captured at HPMV lights compared to yellow/orange HPS lights (Eisenbeis 2006). Warm-white and cool-white LED lights induce less flight-to-light behaviour than HPS lights (Huemer et al 2010;Eisenbeis and Eick 2011), and the virtually monochromatic deep-orange LPS lights are least attractive to insects (Rydell 1992;Blake et al 1994;Eisenbeis 2006;Frank 2006).…”
Section: Interference Of Light Pollution With Nocturnal Navigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, light pollution is an overlooked disruptor of natural habitats that also perturbs individual physiological processes that rely on precise light information [2]. Artificial illumination at night impacts animal populations by disrupting orientation [3], reproduction [4], and by changing predation and competition pressures [5]. The repercussions of these behavioural and physiological changes in natural systems remain largely unknown and constitute a new and relevant focus for ecological research [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eyes of some bats in the chiropteran suborder Yangochiroptera (formerly Microchiroptera) appear most sensitive to light intensities comparable to those available during crepuscular periods (Müller et al 2009), and the adaptive advantages to seeing UV may include orientation by post-sunset glow, stars, and polarized light patterns in the sky (Childs & Buchler 1981, Buchler & Childs 1982, Greif et al 2014. Insects, particularly moths, are also known to aggregate at lights rich in short-wavelengths (van Langevelde et al 2011), and these aggregations may in turn attract foraging insectivorous bats (Blake et al 1994, Rydell & Racey 1995, Minnaar et al 2014, Mathews et al 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%