2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2005.00561.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of libraries and electronic information resources by primary care staff: outcomes from a survey

Abstract: Objectives : To assess the use of existing libraries; usage of the Internet and biomedical databases; and need for training on use of the Internet and biomedical databases for primary care staff.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(12 reference statements)
2
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, lack of time was the reason most frequently given for non-uptake of the free resource on offer to THOR-GP contributors. In a different context, lack of time was given as a reason for non-use of Internet resources by primary care staff in Nottingham and Rotherham [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, lack of time was the reason most frequently given for non-uptake of the free resource on offer to THOR-GP contributors. In a different context, lack of time was given as a reason for non-use of Internet resources by primary care staff in Nottingham and Rotherham [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the growing demand for appropriate consumer health information on the Internet has been the topic of much recent medical, social science and information science literature (Pereira et al 2001;Basch et al 2004;Bleakley et al 2004;Brotherton 2004;Dickerson et al 2004;Mick 2004;Ziebland et al 2004;Balmer 2005;Bright et al 2005;Doney et al 2005;Escoffery et al 2005;Rees 2005), there has been a noticeable absence of reports that describe how to adequately design such online resources. What is more, the outcomes of online health information ventures have been extremely uneven and a growing body of literature alerts to the questionable quality of content, language, site maintenance, and accessibility provided by health information sites (Sullivan et al 2003;Birru and Steinman 2004;Felber 2004;Fikar and Keith 2004;Friedman et al 2004;Ilic et al 2004;Jorgensen and Gotzsche 2004;Molassiotis and Xu 2004;Morahan-Martin 2004;Nahm et al 2004;Weissenberger and Schultze-Seemann 2004;Zeng and Parmanto 2004;Boulos 2005;Changrani and Gany 2005;Ekman et al 2005;Simon and Hegedus 2005;Viswanath 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…No measurement of GP activity had previously been made, but library staff perceived that usage had fallen and that GPs were not taking full advantage of the library services on offer, a perception not confined to Cornwall. 1 In August 2004, the library was to be relocated to a new building and integrated with the Peninsula Medical School and University of Plymouth. The authors were concerned that this integration with large educational institutions might make GPs feel more isolated from the CHLS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%