2012
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2012.745019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of lidar data to simulate forest net primary production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For relatively small areas an alternative could be provided by tree height estimates obtained from LiDAR data, which can be used as a proxy of tree age (Maselli et al 2013), though old small individuals and, vice-versa, trees with huge biomass accumulated in few decades, can be found in forest ecosystems (Marziliano et al 2012). Finally, as regards the last step, its application on regional to national scales is virtually unfeasible, since the dendrochronological measurements needed to characterize specific site history can be obtained only for small areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For relatively small areas an alternative could be provided by tree height estimates obtained from LiDAR data, which can be used as a proxy of tree age (Maselli et al 2013), though old small individuals and, vice-versa, trees with huge biomass accumulated in few decades, can be found in forest ecosystems (Marziliano et al 2012). Finally, as regards the last step, its application on regional to national scales is virtually unfeasible, since the dendrochronological measurements needed to characterize specific site history can be obtained only for small areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actual status of the two stands was instead accounted for by modifying the model combination strategy on the basis of the previously exposed considerations. The scalars describing vegetation status required by equation 3 (FC and NV) were derived from the analysis of the LiDAR dataset of 2015 using the allometric relationships described in [21]. These scalars were kept constant during the simulation period for the mature umbrella pine stand, where great green and woody biomass variations are not expected in a relatively short time period.…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data were then averaged on a stand basis basis (NDVI 1 and NDVI 2), linearly interpolated to a daily time step and combined with the weather data to drive Modified C-Fix (Equation ( 1)). A BIOME-BGC version parameterized for Mediterranean pines was then applied using the same meteorological dataset and ancillary information [20]. Three series of GPP estimates were thus obtained, the first from BIOME-BGC, referred to both stands (GPP BIOME), and the others from C-Fix driven by the NDVI series of the two stands (i.e., GPP C-Fix 1 for umbrella pine and GPP C-Fix 2 for maritime pine).…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actual status of the two stands was instead accounted for by modifying the model combination strategy on the basis of the previously exposed considerations. The scalars describing vegetation status required by Equation (3) (FC and NV) were derived from the analysis of the LiDAR dataset taken in 2015 using the allometric relationships described in [20]. These scalars were kept constant during the simulation period for the mature umbrella pine stand, where great green and woody biomass variations are not expected over a relatively short time period.…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation