2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of life cycle assessment and water quality analysis to evaluate the environmental impacts of the bioremediation of polluted water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the FWs system under study, the characterization results (Table 3) indicate that ADP, AP, GWP, ODP, and HTP are mainly affected by the stage of raw materials production and acquisition. The highest values have been detected in the global warming potential (GWP) and the human toxicity potential (HTP)-a similar effect of the raw materials stage on these two parameters was also reported by Yao et al for combined ecological floating beds [27]. In the categories of FAETP, TETP, and POCP, the construction stage was the most positive contributor, whereas in the case of EP, there was an almost equal contribution of the raw materials stage and the operational stage of the system.…”
Section: Environmental Impact Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In the FWs system under study, the characterization results (Table 3) indicate that ADP, AP, GWP, ODP, and HTP are mainly affected by the stage of raw materials production and acquisition. The highest values have been detected in the global warming potential (GWP) and the human toxicity potential (HTP)-a similar effect of the raw materials stage on these two parameters was also reported by Yao et al for combined ecological floating beds [27]. In the categories of FAETP, TETP, and POCP, the construction stage was the most positive contributor, whereas in the case of EP, there was an almost equal contribution of the raw materials stage and the operational stage of the system.…”
Section: Environmental Impact Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In a study, Wang et al ( 2021 ) reported as Ss = 5–100 mg/L; DO = 2–9 mg/L; BOD 5 = 0–12 mg/L; COD = 30–150 mg/L; TP = 0.1–1.0 mg/L; TN = 2–6 mg/L for a hyper-eutrophic Lake in China. The worst lake water quality in Chinese standards was defined as DO < 1 mg/L, COD = 61 mg/L, NH 3 –N = 4.25 mg/L, TKN = 14 mg/L, and TP = 0.82 mg/L (Yao et al 2021 ). DO, COD, NH 3 -N, TKN, and TP average concentrations of lake water were 7.77, 18.11, 0.31, 1.06, and 0.05 mg/L, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous reports have also indicated reduced P removal efficacy in plant systems. For example, Yao et al used C. indica that removed 50.9-74.0% of phosphates from SEW (Yao et al 2021). In a similar study, an ecological floating bed composed of Typha domingensis could only remove 37% phosphate from household wastewater (Benvenuti et al 2018).…”
Section: Phosphate Removal In Reactor Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the impacts of the growing human population on the environment is an increase in the rate at which nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) enter the biosphere, which is expected to increase far more in the next few decades (Yao et al 2021). These large amounts of nutrients being discharged into water bodies via domestic, agricultural, and industrial effluents lead to environmental pollution, thereby causing eutrophication (Boeykens et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%