1997
DOI: 10.1177/014556139707600705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Diagnosis of Sigmoid Sinus Thrombosis

Abstract: Magnetic resonance angiography is an established radiologic technique which is rapidly becoming useful in imaging the head and neck. Currently, this imaging modality is important in the diagnosis of sigmoid sinus thrombosis caused by otologic disease. Since the introduction of antibiotic therapy, the percentage of deaths attributed to intracranial complications from otitic disease has decreased from 2.5 to approximately 0.25% of documented deaths. Also, the incidence of sinus thrombosis within this group has d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The additional use of magnetic resonance venography permits the distinction between slow venous flow and occlusive thrombus, which may be difficult to determine from spin echo MRI sequences. 13 The majority of the patients in our series were diagnosed with MRI/magnetic resonance venography (2 patients were diagnosed by angiography before the routine use of MRI). The neuroradiological diagnosis of venous sinus thrombosis is often challenging given the high frequency of dural venous sinus anatomical variants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The additional use of magnetic resonance venography permits the distinction between slow venous flow and occlusive thrombus, which may be difficult to determine from spin echo MRI sequences. 13 The majority of the patients in our series were diagnosed with MRI/magnetic resonance venography (2 patients were diagnosed by angiography before the routine use of MRI). The neuroradiological diagnosis of venous sinus thrombosis is often challenging given the high frequency of dural venous sinus anatomical variants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…12 Several authors have advocated for the use of MRI and magnetic resonance venography for increased diagnostic yield. 4,13 MRI not only offers the advantage of imaging in multiple planes but also eliminates the risk of ionizing radiation compared with computed tomography or angiogram, which is particularly helpful in the pediatric population. MRI offers the advantage of simultaneously aiding in the diagnosis of associated mastoiditis and other potential intracranial complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of OLST was suspected by CT scan in only five cases because the majority of CT scans in emergency situations are performed without contrast enhancement, which significantly reduces the opportunity to detect such a blood flow interruption. Although the gold standard for the diagnosis of OLST remains arteriography, angioresonance imaging (MR angiography) is an interesting non-invasive method that can clearly delineate the patency of central nervous system venous sinuses and can be performed at the same time as the brain MRI study [4,6,7]. In cases of COM with suspected intracranial complications, our image evaluation protocol now includes a CT scan without iodine contrast followed by a cranial MRI with gadolinium enhancement and angio-resonance imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some advocate its use [1,7,9,10], while others suggest its inefficiency [4,6,8]. Even those who support anticoagulation recognize that the ideal level of anticoagulation is difficult to achieve and control, and anticoagulation introduces additional risks and prolongs hospitalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The early detection of this complication by CT and MRI scans allowed early systemic fibrinolytic therapy (Kelly et al, 1991;Magliulo et al, 1996;Davison et al, 1997;Greess et al 2002). Thus, local fibrinolytic therapy (Tsai et al, 1992;PerezDuenas et al, 2002) or thrombectomy (Scarrow et al, 1999;Chow et al, 2000) could be avoided and early rehabilitation with improving neurological symptoms was achieved (Satake et al, 1997).…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%