2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06718-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of magnets in gastrointestinal surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yamanouchi et al [3,4] reported the first use of MCA in the 1990s, and MCA has been performed to treat complications such as obstruction of esophagojejunostomy after total gastrectomy or ileus for patients unsuitable for general anesthesia, stenosis of the bile duct after intraoperative bile duct injury, and stricture of choledochojejunostomy after living donor transplantation [5][6][7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yamanouchi et al [3,4] reported the first use of MCA in the 1990s, and MCA has been performed to treat complications such as obstruction of esophagojejunostomy after total gastrectomy or ileus for patients unsuitable for general anesthesia, stenosis of the bile duct after intraoperative bile duct injury, and stricture of choledochojejunostomy after living donor transplantation [5][6][7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compression induces an ischemia-necrosis-scarring cycle, which creates a patent connection in approximately 5 to 10 days. 20,21 This gradual process induces healing with a lower inflammatory reaction when compared to stapled anastomoses. 22 The model of magnetic loop anastomosis used in this study was easy to perform.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic technologies are now applied to surgical instruments, designed to work in tandem with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) to further reduce the invasiveness of procedures 1–3 . The development of new surgical techniques and novel technologies has resulted in lessened surgical trauma and improvement of patient outcomes including; reduced pain, less complications, less scars, shorter length of hospital stay, faster recovery period and better rate of patient acceptance 4 . Recently, device development and technique modification have focused to reduce the number and size of surgical instruments required to perform common procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%